97 % of the worlds climatologists have been wrong about man made global warming.
The models failed.
Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, last week dismissed the significance of the plateau, saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.
Others disagreed. Professor Judith Curry, who is the head of the climate science department at Americaâs prestigious Georgia Tech university, told The Mail on Sunday that it was clear that the computer models used to predict future warming were âdeeply flawedâ.
Even Prof Jones admitted that he and his colleagues did not understand the impact of ânatural variabilityâ â factors such as long-term ocean temperature cycles and changes in the output of the sun. However, he said he was still convinced that the current decade would end up significantly warmer than the previous two.
---
Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
By JONATHAN PETRE
UPDATED: 12:12 EST, 14 February 2010
Comments (976)
Share
Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing
There has been no global warming since 1995
Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
Data: Professor Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be'
The academic at the centre of the âClimategateâ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble âkeeping trackâ of the information.
Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.
Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ânot as good as it should beâ.
The data is crucial to the famous âhockey stick graphâ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.
Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now â suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz2KBXym3TE
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...y-released--chart-prove-it.html#ixzz2KBX8CczX
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Quote from futurecurrents:
Now I know some people will just say that this is due to mainstream scientists suppressing controversy and all that, but let me be succinct: Thatâs bull. Science thrives on dissenting ideas, it grows and learns from them. If there is actual evidence to support an idea, it gets published. I can point out copious examples in my own field of astronomy where papers get published about all manners of against-the-mainstream thinking, some of which come to conclusions that, in my opinion, are clearly wrong.
So let this be clear: There is no scientific controversy over this. Climate change denial is purely, 100 percent made-up political and corporate-sponsored crap. When the loudest voices are fossil-fuel funded think tanks, when they donât publish in journals but instead write error-laden op-eds in partisan venues, when they have to manipulate the data to support their point, then what theyâre doing isnât science.
Itâs nonsense. And worse, itâs dangerous nonsense. Because theyâre fiddling with the data while the world burns.
