The Great Global Warming Swindle

Quote from futurecurrents:

"That’s bull. Science thrives on dissenting ideas, it grows and learns from them. If there is actual evidence to support an idea, it gets published. I can point out copious examples in my own field of astronomy where papers get published about all manners of against-the-mainstream thinking, some of which come to conclusions that, in my opinion, are clearly wrong.

So let this be clear: There is no scientific controversy over this. Climate change denial is purely, 100 percent made-up political and corporate-sponsored crap. When the loudest voices are fossil-fuel funded think tanks, when they don’t publish in journals but instead write error-laden op-eds in partisan venues, when they have to manipulate the data to support their point, then what they’re doing isn’t science.

It’s nonsense. And worse, it’s dangerous nonsense. Because they’re fiddling with the data while the world burns."
More...

Let this be clear. Universities thrive on being funded, not on dissenting ideas. The top source of university research funding during the past decade is 'global warming' dollars amounting to over $50 Billion dollars poured in to universities to fund research results that are pre-ordained in advance.

A good portion of papers that pass peer review are factually wrong. Why are these papers allowed to pass peer review? Many have to be retracted after being found to be totally fabricated. For example, the clown in England whose papers claimed that vaccines cause autism with entirely made-up data. It is tragic that factually incorrect papers are cited in public policy decisions that cost millions (if not billions) of dollars and cause public misery.

The global warming hoax is not merely fiddling with data but fabricating data while the world burns - it is driving bad public policy causing misery throughout the third world by denying people electricity and energy. All of this is outlined in the The Great Global Warming Swindle video. You should watch it and learn.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Let this be clear. Universities thrive on being funded, not on dissenting ideas. .
More...
Everyone needs money, including your dissenters. Tiny fringe groups probably need it more than anyone.
 
To those who believe man made CO2 is causing Global warming.

Please put forth here on this thread...

Your top five

proofs
evidence
conjecture

of man causing Global warming.

Please label your proffer as proof evidence or conjecture.

I would like to see if you realize you are bullshitting or not.
 
Quote from jem:

To those who believe man made CO2 is causing Global warming.

Please put forth here on this thread...

Your top five

proofs
evidence
conjecture

of man causing Global warming.

Please label your proffer as proof evidence or conjecture.

I would like to see if you realize you are bullshitting or not.
More...
You still haven't answered my question: does the CO2 molecule absorb radiant energy at wavelengths above 4000 nanometers, or not?
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Let this be clear. Universities thrive on being funded, not on dissenting ideas. The top source of university research funding during the past decade is 'global warming' dollars amounting to over $50 Billion dollars poured in to universities to fund research results that are pre-ordained in advance.

A good portion of papers that pass peer review are factually wrong. Why are these papers allowed to pass peer review? Many have to be retracted after being found to be totally fabricated. For example, the clown in England whose papers claimed that vaccines cause autism with entirely made-up data. It is tragic that factually incorrect papers are cited in public policy decisions that cost millions (if not billions) of dollars and cause public misery.

The global warming hoax is not merely fiddling with data but fabricating data while the world burns - it is driving bad public policy causing misery throughout the third world by denying people electricity and energy. All of this is outlined in the The Great Global Warming Swindle video. You should watch it and learn.
More...


blah blah blah WRONG!!! YOU'RE DELUSIONAL !!!!
 
Quote from Ricter:

You still haven't answered my question: does the CO2 molecule absorb radiant energy at wavelengths above 4000 nanometers, or not?
More...

If you have the brain power or the guts to make the argument that man made CO2 is causing warming on the earth...(not in a lab holding all other things equal) go ahead and make your argument.

I have made a very simple challenge.
You tell us 97% of the worlds experts say man made CO2 is causing warming...

So lets see the proof.. or the absence of proof the evidence or in the absence of evidence the conjecture.

By the way I googled this before laying down the challenge...

You know what you get from NASA?

1. a scary graph of CO2... .like the one used by fc
2. a comment that in a lab CO2 can reflect warming (ricter and fc's frequent argument)
3. and scary pictures.

I would score that as zero proof
zero evidence (because a lab is not an open CO2 eating system like the earth)
some conjecture
 
Quote from Ricter:

You still haven't answered my question: does the CO2 molecule absorb radiant energy at wavelengths above 4000 nanometers, or not?
More...

He's admitted that CO2 is greenhouse gas.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

blah blah blah WRONG!!! YOU'RE DELUSIONAL !!!!
More...

Is that the best you can come up with? You are totally unable to carry on a rational conversation and outline information & data. You have to resort to posting "That's bullshit" and "You're delusional". I take it that shouting using the caps will provide so much more emphasis.

The Toronto National Post has a very good series of articles over time called the "The Deniers". Perhaps you should read them and get educated.

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=c6a32614-f906-4597-993d-f181196a6d71
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top