God or science?
Superstition or fact?
Jehova or Allah?
Why is the argument consistently discussed on a philosophical angle rather than a scientific one?
The facts are quite simple. Even the worlds most credible scientists agree there IS a God. To argue otherwise is quite ignorant.
I put it to you that if you could calculate the probability that we are here by chance, through evolution, etc (i.e. trying to prove a hypothesis that there is NO God). The findings are that for us to be here, in the world we live in, with all it's intertwining relationships that support each other so perfectly will give a number that is so minute that we would have to disregard the probability that there is/was no 'grand creator'. It just cannot be so.
Given the age of the earth that is known scientifically (not the 10,000 years or how ever long the fundamentalists who miss interpret the Bible IMO), there simply hasnt been enough time to allow for the speed of development of any species, yet alone the evolution mankind has witnessed in his very short space of time.
So, for all you atheists who love to fall back on science, I fear you really need a sanity check and to do your homework before using science and math to back your claims of no God. I put it to you that science actually PROVES the existence of God.
I put it you the reason why there are so many unbelievers is because of some miss interpretations of the Bible, often used by people for their own ends (such as fundamentalism) that turns people off. Oddly enough, the Bible actually states this will happen. There are countless other prophesies in the Bible that have proved themselves oover the course of history due to the very nature of mankind. Funny how the author (God - or humans to the non-believers) knew so much about human nature, biology and science in a time when there is no way we could have learnt such knowledge ourselves. Where did that knowledge come from?
Superstition or fact?
Jehova or Allah?
Why is the argument consistently discussed on a philosophical angle rather than a scientific one?
The facts are quite simple. Even the worlds most credible scientists agree there IS a God. To argue otherwise is quite ignorant.
I put it to you that if you could calculate the probability that we are here by chance, through evolution, etc (i.e. trying to prove a hypothesis that there is NO God). The findings are that for us to be here, in the world we live in, with all it's intertwining relationships that support each other so perfectly will give a number that is so minute that we would have to disregard the probability that there is/was no 'grand creator'. It just cannot be so.
Given the age of the earth that is known scientifically (not the 10,000 years or how ever long the fundamentalists who miss interpret the Bible IMO), there simply hasnt been enough time to allow for the speed of development of any species, yet alone the evolution mankind has witnessed in his very short space of time.
So, for all you atheists who love to fall back on science, I fear you really need a sanity check and to do your homework before using science and math to back your claims of no God. I put it to you that science actually PROVES the existence of God.
I put it you the reason why there are so many unbelievers is because of some miss interpretations of the Bible, often used by people for their own ends (such as fundamentalism) that turns people off. Oddly enough, the Bible actually states this will happen. There are countless other prophesies in the Bible that have proved themselves oover the course of history due to the very nature of mankind. Funny how the author (God - or humans to the non-believers) knew so much about human nature, biology and science in a time when there is no way we could have learnt such knowledge ourselves. Where did that knowledge come from?
