The Global Warming Hoax is falling apart

[FeenixRizin]

Quote from drjekyllus:

The report also stated New Zealand and South Africa as well, it was nice of you to leave that out.

this guy actually believes his idiocy ... his nuerosis is funny, but so do the Democratically controlled Congress and White House

On the up side, once this insanity hits people in the pocket books, the idiots who unleashed it will be run out of office, perhaps for decades



more funny shit:

Solar Physicist Predicts Ice Age. What happened to global warming?

http://www.examiner.com/x-13886-New...dicts-Ice-Age-What-happened-to-global-warming


"THE CYCLE 24 HAS NOW GONE CLEARLY BELOW DALTON LEVEL."

This is pretty strong evidence. Had you been reading these reports for a few years you would have seen that Timo has been very conservative in his predictions. His earlier predictions were much less severe but trust me, you would be a lot happier with global warming than you will be with a Maunder type solar event. You can take that to the bank. The only thing that makes me grin about this is that it will end the man made global warming scam once and for all. Unless they can convince politicians that we did that too.

 

[drjekyllus]

Quote from FeenixRizin:

this guy actually believes his idiocy ... his nuerosis is funny, but so do the Democratically controlled Congress and White House

On the up side, once this insanity hits people in the pocket books, the idiots who unleashed it will be run out of office, perhaps for decades

Every Reagan needs a Carter. We have Carter 2.0 right now.

 

[FeenixRizin]

remind anyone of anyone?



But as so-called "global warming" proves fictional, those who would shackle the economy with taxes and regulations to fight mythology increasingly resemble deinstitutionalized derelicts on an urban street corner, wildly swatting at their own imaginary monsters.

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Haroki:

Ahem.

"The latest global averaged satellite temperature data for June 2009 reveal yet another drop in Earth's temperature"

Okay, guys, for the umpteenth time:

Regional data is not global averages

Individual months are not sufficient sample sizes.

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from drjekyllus:

You made a statement comparing the US as a whole to Iceland as a whole. It was a dishonest comparison because the two countries have different situations. What don't you understand about that?

How are they different?

Iceland -- has access to geothermal.

United States -- has access to geothermal.

 

[Haroki]

Quote from bigdavediode:

Okay, guys, for the umpteenth time:

Regional data is not global averages

Individual months are not sufficient sample sizes.

Ah, good to see that you admit that you lied about the study being regional then.

Why am I not surprised?

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Haroki:

Ah, good to see that you admit that you lied about the study being regional then.

Why am I not surprised?

Perhaps your confusion outweighs your surprise?

You'll have to explain to what study you're referring.

 

[drjekyllus]

Quote from Haroki:

Ahem.

"The latest global averaged satellite temperature data for June 2009 reveal yet another drop in Earth's temperature"

Quote from bigdavediode:

Okay, guys, for the umpteenth time:

Regional data is not global averages

Individual months are not sufficient sample sizes.

Haroki was refering to The latest global averaged satellite temperature.

This is not regional data.

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from drjekyllus:

Quote from Haroki:

Ahem.

"The latest global averaged satellite temperature data for June 2009 reveal yet another drop in Earth's temperature"








Haroki was refering to The latest global averaged satellite temperature.

This is not regional data.

Uhhh, yes, but it's only one month.

When backtesting for trading, do you use historical data of only one month?

Of course not. Because it's an insufficient sample size.

 

[drjekyllus]

Quote from bigdavediode:

Uhhh, yes, but it's only one month.

When backtesting for trading, do you use historical data of only one month?

Of course not. Because it's an insufficient sample size.

So we use the months where the earth is getting hotter as proof of global warming and we disregard the months where it got cooler. I see how this game works. Can we apply this trading? We could keep the winners and completely write off the losers.

BTW, the Earth is 4.5 Billion years old, what is a good sample size?