The Future of Warfare by Wealthy Nations - Mercenaries

The Future of Warfare by Wealthy Nations - Mercenaries...

Emirates Secretly Sends Colombian Mercenaries to Yemen Fight
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/26/w...-colombian-mercenaries-to-fight-in-yemen.html

The United Arab Emirates has secretly dispatched hundreds of Colombian mercenaries to Yemen to fight in that country’s raging conflict, adding a volatile new element in a complex proxy war that has drawn in the United States and Iran.

It is the first combat deployment for a foreign army that the Emirates has quietly built in the desert over the past five years, according to several people currently or formerly involved with the project. The program was once managed by a private company connected to Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater Worldwide, but the people involved in the effort said that his role ended several years ago and that it has since been run by the Emirati military.

The arrival in Yemen of 450 Latin American troops — among them are also Panamanian, Salvadoran and Chilean soldiers — adds to the chaotic stew of government armies, armed tribes, terrorist networks and Yemeni militias currently at war in the country. Earlier this year, a coalition of countries led by Saudi Arabia, including the United States, began a military campaign in Yemen against Houthi rebels who have pushed the Yemeni government out of the capital, Sana.

It is also a glimpse into the future of war. Wealthy Arab nations, particularly Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the Emirates, have in recent years embraced a more aggressive military strategy throughout the Middle East, trying to rein in the chaos unleashed by the Arab revolutions that began in late 2010. But these countries wade into the new conflicts — whether in Yemen, Syria or Libya — with militaries that are unused to sustained warfare and populations with generally little interest in military service.

“Mercenaries are an attractive option for rich countries who wish to wage war yet whose citizens may not want to fight,” said Sean McFate, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and author of “The Modern Mercenary.”


(more at above url)
 
Whatever happened to those Hessions?

German_Soldiers%20stats.jpg
 
thanks for the chart... it made me look things up.

I didn't realize the hessians were recruited under false pretenses. (at least some of them) had been told they were going to be fighting on behalf of colonists suppressing Indian rebellions. They were offered 50 acres to desert... some did.
 
The Hessians weren't recruited individually. The British paid local rulers, who sent units to fight.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hessian_(soldier)

Family records of Johann Nicholas Bahnert, one of the Hessians captured in the Battle of Trenton, indicate that back in Europe they were told they were needed to defend the American Colonies against Indian incursions. Only after they arrived, did they discover they had been hired to fight against the British-American colonists, rather than the Indians.[10] The Hessians captured in the Battle of Trenton were paraded through the streets of Philadelphia to raise American morale; anger at their presence helped the Continental Army recruit new soldiers.[11] Most of the prisoners were sent to work as farm hands.[12]

By early 1778, negotiations for the exchange of prisoners between Washington and the British had begun in earnest.[13] Nicholas Bahner(t), Jacob Strobe, George Geisler, and Conrad Kramm are a few of the Hessian soldiers who deserted the British forces after being returned in exchange for American prisoners of war.[14] These men were hunted by the British for being deserters as well as by many of the colonists as a foreign enemy.


Americans tried to entice Hessians to desert from the British and join the already large German-American population. The US Congress authorized the offer of 50 acres (approximately 20 hectares) of land to individual Hessian soldiers to encourage them to desert. British soldiers were offered 50 to 800 acres, depending on rank.
 
^ I meant they weren't individually recruited by the British. Smart policy for the Continental Congress to do so, because land was prosperity to German villagers, and they weren't going to inherit it back home unless they were the first son.
 
Back
Top