The future of the democratic party, Mattress girl and Pajama boy

Your view of hate is essentially anything you don't agree with. This is exhibit A on the whole "ban hate speech" argument. Who knows what would be illegal to say if folks like you were left in charge?
See also "Exhibit AAA" for a prime example.
 
What better ideas does she have?
Judge where she wants to take the country by what she has done or tried to do in the past. (Trend following, if you will.)

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/0...lishments-so-quit-saying-she-doesnt-have-any/

http://correctrecord.org/the-points...res-hillary-clintons-achievements-as-senator/

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/lesli...clintons-accomplishments-speak-for-themselves

(If you absolutely insist, I'll copy & paste.)

Compare that record to the various members belonging to the glorious Party of No Achievement (or little of it).
 
Judge where she wants to take the country by what she has done in the past. (Trend following, if you will.)

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/0...lishments-so-quit-saying-she-doesnt-have-any/

http://correctrecord.org/the-points...res-hillary-clintons-achievements-as-senator/

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/lesli...clintons-accomplishments-speak-for-themselves

(If you absolutely insist, I'll copy & paste.)

Compare that to the glorious Party of No Achievement.

These are the same links you posted in the other thread, faulty for the same reasons they were in that thread. For instance, the first link describes her credentials. It doesn't talk about any of her ideas for the future. I asked you what ideas she has that are so outstanding, as you claimed.

Don't you have an opinion of your own on this subject? You haven't answered any specifics on the subject of your love for Clinton, even once.
 
These are the same links you posted in the other thread, faulty for the same reasons they were in that thread. For instance, the first link describes her credentials. It doesn't talk about any of her ideas for the future. I asked you what ideas she has that are so outstanding, as you claimed.

Don't you have an opinion of your own on this subject? You haven't answered any specifics on the subject of your love for Clinton, even once.
In response to your first comment, please read the first sentence of my prior post. In response to your second question, my opinions are aligned with the facts as they are presented. You seem to want to play a game by rules of your own choosing that fail to convince me of their utility. You know where I stand and why. There you have it.
 
In response to your first comment, please read the first sentence of my prior post. In response to your second question, my opinions are aligned with the facts as they are presented. You seem to want to play a game by rules of your own that fail to convince me of their utility. You know where I stand and why. There you have it.

Your opinions are aligned with what facts? I ask you what ideas she has that are outstanding, you give me links about her credentials. That's like me asking you what time it is, you telling me how to build a watch and then saying the fault is on me for playing games.

It is quite obvious you have no real opinions on this outside of "Ready for Hillary" because she is a democrat and apart from media talking points, don't understand the subject at all (besides the partisanship, that is). Thank God you are Canadian and don't get a vote. Unfortunately for the U.S., there are millions like you who do.
 
Hillary is simply taking the place of Obama among the utterly mindless "X can do nothing right" crowd. Unfortunately for the US, they get a vote.
 
Back
Top