My point is this. Anyone that post charts with entires, exits or both...they aren't required to explain such to you or anyone else
But this is the thing. He is trying to teach a method. He isn't showing what he would actually do or did. I wouldn't ask someone to justify a trade they took if they just said it felt right to them. But these are potential trades marked on a chart that would fulfill the rules of the method he is trying to teach. So either there is another subset of rules that state when not to take these trades, or they are simply cherry picked after the result is known.
Don't even mention the crap about B1S2.
Fair enough. But if you do back up far enough, there was another day where someone had pressed Db about if he took a trade or not where he said he did, and then he backed down. In essence, we have both B1S2 and Db showing highly incomplete systems. Db's system is at least a little more complete as I have no idea what B1 does, and he has plenty for rule for why to even skip certain trades where the indicators say to take a trade, etc, so as an observer, its funny to me because its a case of "the pot calling the kettle black", no matter how you look at it.
I'm extremely familiar with Wyckoff and AMT.
Sweet. This is the part where Db shines. But SLA boxes him into simply trading patterns, and as a result, there are trades he wants to skip because he knows they won't work, but based on SLA they have to be taken, so in a way, I think he is really tripping himself up. I have always said that it is my opinion that he wants to teach Wyckoff, AMT, behavior, but instead tries to distill it down to simple rules which actually don't benefit the beginner all that much given that he doesn't follow his own rules based on how he marks up his charts.
However, I've been around the block a few times to know that two traders using the same analysis can be using different trade signal strategies because it suits their trading style.
SLA isn't analysis. Its a set of rules, so its not that hard to follow. The trades he showed, the short off 4396 isn't even an SLA trade if you ask me since no line was broken. If anything, you could maybe put this into the AMT category, since its a trade based on a rejection of a range extreme. But there are no AMT rules per say. All he ever says it to trade the BO, go long above, short below. If anything, AMT and SLA in some ways contradict.... so there has to be way to justify this, but there isn't. The answer of course is something like "trader's choice", or "more backtesting". Which is fine, but once again, if you're gonna show something on a chart, there should be a rule for it.
Thus, if I see someone post 100 charts with a few that doesn't correlate...so what...big deal...get over it.
NoDoji would beat you up for this! LOL... RN I think would also say that if you slip up once, what's to say you won't slip up again. If you slip up, and it works out, it gives you permission to slip up again and again, doing more damage perhaps. Point is that rules should never be broken, unless you have a rule about breaking the rule.
you've killed that possibility
In my opinion, my attacks have never been personal, and I've never called him names. But lets also not forget that perhaps the reason I'm not getting an answer isn't because of me, but because the answer cannot be given. I do believe that Db trades, and I do believe he does well. But what he shows, which he thinks is designed to help the beginner, is actually accomplishing the opposite goal. Its one thing to understand a market, another thing to trade it in real time. He is trying to make the "trading it in real time" a simple proposition, which it is not. He is trying to distill it down to simple rules, but these don't work often enough for a new trader to find consistency early on.
That's my point, you need clarification but you've ruin the possibility of getting such. Nobody is required to explain anything to you. That's your fault.
I have already taken myself out of the equation. I don't need anything. I'm here simply to share my viewpoint.
In conclusion, I do love your posts wrbtrader. You make excellent points that are well argued, and although I don't agree with some of it, its a pleasure to get the chance to reply to you because you present a logical thought process that I can understand and that leads to a civil discussion.
