Right,nobody but Trump supporters gives a shit about Trump tying to deflect from the horrible job he is doing,the thousands that are dying everyday under his leadership and the millions who have lost their jobs.
The Flynn Entrapment
- Thread starter Poindexter
- Start date
Right,nobody but Trump supporters gives a shit about Trump tying to deflect from the horrible job he is doing,the thousands that are dying everyday under his leadership and the millions who have lost their jobs.
CNN has no time for this. They are feverishly working on their next immigration story.
Okay, let's talk about this Flynn thing with Judge Dildo - as I said before- "being wayyy too invested and butt-hurt to be presiding over this case."
The tards as we know are loving it, because they think their hero is still witch-hunting Flynn and can find something to bag him on.
I say, and have said the opposite- ie. Judge Dildo is just disgracing himself. The law is not on his side and he is just forestalling the day when he has to deal with his butt-hurt.
Anyway, I revisit this issue in response to the attached article in Forbes that makes the same point I am making but cites some case law to go with it- from Ruth Ginsberg no less.
So, I am standing by what I said, and your asshole judge is going to be taking up the bo-bo and disgracing himself. If they want to go up to the Supreme Court on some of this, that would be fine too. VERY FINE. Never a good sign when Ruthie and the conservatives are on the same sign.
The guy is a swamp judge who let himself become personally involved in the outcome of the case and ended out/will end out disgracing himself. The very definition of a judge who should recuse. And yes, we know that when he eventually stands down on the issue, he will argue that he was only protecting the judicial process against a rogue justice department. Yeh well, take it up with the supreme court if you want to try to prosecute flynn on something. Asswipe.
Swamp judge. Will not be appointed to the Supreme Court anytime soon and that is what all these DC judges live for.
from Forbes:
Judge Sullivan Disregards Two Controlling Precedents By Appointing Amicus In Flynn Case
U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan disregarded two controlling precedents from higher courts with his decision to appoint John Gleeson as amicus curiae in the U.S. v. Michael Flynn case this week. Judicial conduct similar to J. Sullivan’s in these prior, far less politically charged cases was roundly and unanimously condemned by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, D.C. Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan, and their colleagues across the ideological spectrum. So, whether or not one agrees with the Department of Justice’s call to drop its charges against President Trump’s former National Security Advisor, Gen. Michael Flynn, there should be widespread agreement that J. Sullivan has veered way out of line.
One week ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 9-0 decision, authored by Justice Ginsburg, that took judges to task for similar amicus antics. Her opinion for the Court in U.S. v. Sineneng-Smith upbraided the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for violating a basic aspect of legal proceedings called the “party presentation principle.” In a nutshell, this concept dictates that judges must decide the case as presented by the parties before them. They are not to go out questing for dragons to slay (or issues to tackle) that the parties have not brought before them. As J. Ginsburg put it: “[C]ourts are essentially passive instruments of government … They ‘do not, or should not, sally forth each day looking for wrongs to right. [They] wait for cases to come to [them], and when [cases arise, courts] normally decide only questions presented by the parties.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markch...appointing-amicus-in-flynn-case/#32ff45de6f0a
The tards as we know are loving it, because they think their hero is still witch-hunting Flynn and can find something to bag him on.
I say, and have said the opposite- ie. Judge Dildo is just disgracing himself. The law is not on his side and he is just forestalling the day when he has to deal with his butt-hurt.
Anyway, I revisit this issue in response to the attached article in Forbes that makes the same point I am making but cites some case law to go with it- from Ruth Ginsberg no less.
So, I am standing by what I said, and your asshole judge is going to be taking up the bo-bo and disgracing himself. If they want to go up to the Supreme Court on some of this, that would be fine too. VERY FINE. Never a good sign when Ruthie and the conservatives are on the same sign.
The guy is a swamp judge who let himself become personally involved in the outcome of the case and ended out/will end out disgracing himself. The very definition of a judge who should recuse. And yes, we know that when he eventually stands down on the issue, he will argue that he was only protecting the judicial process against a rogue justice department. Yeh well, take it up with the supreme court if you want to try to prosecute flynn on something. Asswipe.
Swamp judge. Will not be appointed to the Supreme Court anytime soon and that is what all these DC judges live for.
from Forbes:
Judge Sullivan Disregards Two Controlling Precedents By Appointing Amicus In Flynn Case
U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan disregarded two controlling precedents from higher courts with his decision to appoint John Gleeson as amicus curiae in the U.S. v. Michael Flynn case this week. Judicial conduct similar to J. Sullivan’s in these prior, far less politically charged cases was roundly and unanimously condemned by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, D.C. Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan, and their colleagues across the ideological spectrum. So, whether or not one agrees with the Department of Justice’s call to drop its charges against President Trump’s former National Security Advisor, Gen. Michael Flynn, there should be widespread agreement that J. Sullivan has veered way out of line.
One week ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 9-0 decision, authored by Justice Ginsburg, that took judges to task for similar amicus antics. Her opinion for the Court in U.S. v. Sineneng-Smith upbraided the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for violating a basic aspect of legal proceedings called the “party presentation principle.” In a nutshell, this concept dictates that judges must decide the case as presented by the parties before them. They are not to go out questing for dragons to slay (or issues to tackle) that the parties have not brought before them. As J. Ginsburg put it: “[C]ourts are essentially passive instruments of government … They ‘do not, or should not, sally forth each day looking for wrongs to right. [They] wait for cases to come to [them], and when [cases arise, courts] normally decide only questions presented by the parties.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markch...appointing-amicus-in-flynn-case/#32ff45de6f0a
Last edited:
See, you learn something new every day.
Rudy is Petey's neighbor!
https://www.libertyheadlines.com/whitaker-flynn-judge-strzok-friend/
That must be pretty weird these days.
Rudy is Petey's neighbor!
https://www.libertyheadlines.com/whitaker-flynn-judge-strzok-friend/
That must be pretty weird these days.
As discussed, The judge in the Flynn case is totally off the reservation and has allowed his Trump Derangement Syndrome and dislike of Flynn to corrupt his professional conduct.
He has disgraced himself on this one and is getting more attention from the Appellate Court than he wants. Nothing worse than being a judge and having the appellate court that rules on all appeals coming out of your court have to deal with the fact that you have disgraced yourself and the judicial system by being a vindictive buffoon.
Anyway, the Appeals Court has given him ten days to respond to the mandamus motion. If he thinks he is a ballsy and smart guy, then respond to the motion and tell it to the appeals court. I will watch.
Fucking buffoon. Using the amicus process to bring in another judge to find a new crime on Flynn because the government wants to drop charges on the original alleged crime. Say what??? The judge is acting like he is on crack, like a lot of those DC officials are.
The judge is going to lose this one. As it should be.
D.C. Circuit Orders Judge Sullivan to Respond to Flynn Mandamus Petition
https://www.nationalreview.com/corn...dge-sullivan-to-respond-to-mandamus-petition/
He has disgraced himself on this one and is getting more attention from the Appellate Court than he wants. Nothing worse than being a judge and having the appellate court that rules on all appeals coming out of your court have to deal with the fact that you have disgraced yourself and the judicial system by being a vindictive buffoon.
Anyway, the Appeals Court has given him ten days to respond to the mandamus motion. If he thinks he is a ballsy and smart guy, then respond to the motion and tell it to the appeals court. I will watch.
Fucking buffoon. Using the amicus process to bring in another judge to find a new crime on Flynn because the government wants to drop charges on the original alleged crime. Say what??? The judge is acting like he is on crack, like a lot of those DC officials are.
The judge is going to lose this one. As it should be.
D.C. Circuit Orders Judge Sullivan to Respond to Flynn Mandamus Petition
https://www.nationalreview.com/corn...dge-sullivan-to-respond-to-mandamus-petition/
Not to forget Judge Butthurt Sullivan is required to respond to the Appeals Court by the end of the day as to what kind of a clown show he has going there. He has to respond in writing anyway - to the motion or request from the Appeals Court, not sure there is a hearing or appearance required.
Idiot. Too butt-hurt to be on the bench for this case.
That's fine. The Appeals Court or the Supreme Court will square his sorry arse away. And they may allow him to do whatever he is up knowing that it is appealable and they may prefer to just let the lower court take action and then take an appeal from that rather than try to block him in advance. They do like to let the lower courts do their thing first rather than block it. Either way though, sooner or later, Judge Butthurt is not going to win this one and he has disgraced the judicial system by going rogue and butthurt.
Idiot. Too butt-hurt to be on the bench for this case.
That's fine. The Appeals Court or the Supreme Court will square his sorry arse away. And they may allow him to do whatever he is up knowing that it is appealable and they may prefer to just let the lower court take action and then take an appeal from that rather than try to block him in advance. They do like to let the lower courts do their thing first rather than block it. Either way though, sooner or later, Judge Butthurt is not going to win this one and he has disgraced the judicial system by going rogue and butthurt.
Can't wait to see the appeals court try to digest the piece of shit he sent over.
And yes, tards, as I said above, it is not unusual for an appeals court to allow a lower court to proceed but them nail them when it comes up on appeal. They dont like to upset the order of things until the lower court has done its thing. Unless something really fucking stupid is in motion which of court it is.
Sullivan has lost his mind and professional reputation due to TDS. Totally sent himself into the legal toilet after decades of building his reputation up to a fairly decent level. Trump just destroyed his brain, maybe Bill Barr helped, and I am damn sure that Sidney Powell will be named Man of the Year.