Neither the text nor history is a reliable guide to interpreting the amendment. And don't ask the current SCOTUS
Much to be derided, I have often expressed the opinion that our U.S. Constitution, now in its third century, is obsolescent, despite numerous Amendments. Then, I have added, somewhat tongue in check, that we ought to burn it and start over. The reality of my remark scares me. I think I'd rather put up with current defects than chance what an entirely new Constitution might bring. We can, however, make improvements.Neither the text nor history is a reliable guide to interpreting the amendment. And don't ask the current SCOTUS
If our enemies are willing to do it, we gotta do it.Jem, did you see the front page of Bloomberg today? If not, take a look.
Much to be derided, I have often expressed the opinion that our U.S. Constitution, now in its third century, is obsolescent, despite numerous Amendments. Then, I have added, somewhat tongue in check, that we ought to burn it and start over. The reality of my remark scares me. I think I'd rather put up with current defects than chance what an entirely new Constitution might bring. We can, however, make improvements.
The First Amendment, off all the amendments, including the Second, is the one that must be repealed and replaced with an up to date version if our Republic is to survive beyond its third century. Otherwise we are all living in the final century of our Republic.
thanks, wjk.Have you read "The Liberty Amendments" by Mark Levin? If not, give it a read, followed by "Liberty and Tyranny", and "Ameritopia", though not necessarily in any particular order. It would be interesting to see if you still feel the way you do after you read them. I'll get you started...if you're interested.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451606273/?tag=mh0b-20&hvadid=3484774537&ref=pd_sl_4jhmgsctx8_p
That's not just American thinking, it was Soviet thinking too.If our enemies are willing to do it, we gotta do it.