The feds have resumed a controversial program that lets cops take stuff and keep it

The Justice Department today announced that it is resuming a controversial practice that allows local police departments to funnel a large portion of assets seized from citizens into their own coffers under federal law.

The "equitable-sharing" program gives police the option of prosecuting asset forfeiture cases under federal instead of state law. The Justice Department had suspended payments under this program back in December, due to budget cuts included in last year's spending bill.

"In the months since we made the difficult decision to defer equitable sharing payments because of the $1.2 billion rescinded from the Asset Forfeiture Fund, the financial solvency of the fund has improved to the point where it is no longer necessary to continue deferring Equitable Sharing payments," spokesman Peter J. Carr said.

Asset forfeiture is a contentious practice that lets police seize and keep cash and property from people who are never convicted — and in many cases,never charged— with wrongdoing. Recent reports have found that the use of the practice has exploded in recent years, prompting concern that, in some cases, police are motivated more by profit and less by justice.

The Justice Department's equitable sharing program allowed state and local authorities to pursue asset forfeiture under federal, rather than state law. Federal forfeiture policies are more permissive than many state policies, allowing police to keep up to 80 percent of assets they seize.

Asset forfeiture is fast growing -- in 2014, for instance, federal authorities seized over $5 billion in assets. That's more than the amount of money lost in every single burglary that year.

imrs.php


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...rogram-that-lets-cops-take-stuff-and-keep-it/
 
4th Amendment.... Unreasonable Search and Seizure?

Our Government can now...

1. Take your property without due process

2. Murder citizens (usually political dissidents or those who "know too much")... or, as perhaps in Scalia's case, political expediency?

3. Imprison people without charging them with a crime and without trial

What does that sound like?

Police state? Tyranny? Dictatorship?

That's Leftism for you.

:(
 
welcome to the police force, we pay you 24k a year and all you can steal
bribes are to cops what tips are to waitresses

A guy I worked with in the computer business family was always in the sherrif dept in Kentucky. When he got out of high school his dad told him they had an opening for him in the dept. His mom thought it was great. He told her, "Mom, I can't do that. I have no moral compass. I only do what's best for me. I have no sense of civic duty." She told him, "Relax, they are all that way, you'll fit right in."

It's fashionable today to defend the police. But I can tell you, pot will never be legalized in Kentucky until the sherrif gets a really good deal.
 
Last edited:
This asset forfeiture is like some banana republic where el Presidente can just take anything he wants. It's an outrage. It's an outrage to the Constitution. It should be shameful for judges and legislators who allow it.

The War on Drugs has been a bigger disaster than republicans' wars in the middle east. Time to cut our losses.
 
It should be shameful for judges and legislators who allow it.

It's like the EBT recipients and other parasites... they "want shit for free". Doesn't matter whether it's right or not, they just WANT! So, now they take and nobody stops them.

"Civil asset forfeiture" is a HUGE affront to the Bill of Rights.. and everything America is supposed to stand for.

Can you imagine? Cops can stop a driver for any reason (made up or not). If in the search finds a few $thousands, can "presume it's illegal drug money". (Maybe the driver was going to buy a used car and the seller wanted cash.) Confiscate the money, confiscate the car, and sell it at auction. Then.... RETAIN 80% OF THE PROCEEDS! All without charging the driver with any crime!

Anyone see how this policy could encourage this outrageous (and according to the US Constitution... ILLEGAL) behavior?


America.... a turd circling the bowl.

:(
 
Last edited:
Back
Top