Quote from Cache Landing:
There is logic to that statement, and I've been saying something similar for years, with the addition that both pop growth & GDP growth should be considered by the "computer".
However, my theory depends on implementing such a plan during an expansion phase. To do that right now would be a nightmare. You think people are losing their homes now? Just wait and see what happens if inflation is stopped.
Or even worse if widespread deflation became a serious problem. People who can afford their mortgages can suck it up when their houses are coming down in price because they know that they'll be there for 20/30 years if necessary and they'll have a roof over their heads and (eventually) a nice little nest egg in equity.
But when deflation becomes widespread it's not worth buying a new fridge freezer because it'll be cheaper next year, and business won't upgrade their infrastructure until it's absolutely necessary. If everybody comes to that conclusion about all goods then the economy stops, feeding deflation on itself. The World managed to absorb the downturn during Japan's problems but if the same happened in the US the global economy couldn't cope, and all those bright little emerging economies would go backwards by decades. And after they came to the conclusion capitalism wasn't for them who would be there, smiling?
With power comes responsibility.
