The Fed has no choice but to raise interest rates and crush the market

Feb 2, 2015

Inflation Reading Furthest Away From Fed Target Since 2009
By Eric Morath

BN-GT261_PCETre_G_20150202110825.jpg



"A rapid deceleration in consumer inflation could complicate the Federal Reserve’s calculus for when to lift short-term interest rates from near zero.

"The price index for personal consumption expenditures, the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, was up 0.7% in December from a year earlier, the Commerce Department said Monday. That was the smallest 12-month gain for consumer prices since October 2009, just after the economy started emerging from a deep recession.

"Fed officials have signaled their intent to raise benchmark interest rates this year for the first time since 2006. Doing so could be difficult if price increases continue to far undershoot the central bank’s 2% target, suggesting weak demand persists in the economy.

"The inflation gauge has failed to even match the Fed target for 32 straight months.

"A swift fall in oil and related energy products is responsible for the decline in overall inflation from 1.6% in July. Fed officials have largely dismissed the pullback as a “transitory” factor that will ultimately prove short-lived.

"But energy is not the only factor in the economy weighing on price gains. “Stagnant household incomes have resulted in a lack of demand for retailers and manufacturers,” said Navy Federal Credit Union economist Alan MacEachin. “They don’t have any pricing flexibility.”

"Steady job creation has helped to push the unemployment rate down to 5.6%, the lowest level since 2008. That rate would likely need to drop further, into the 4% range, to force employers to lift wages in order to attract workers, Mr. MacEachin said.

"Inflation has been steadier outside of volatile food and energy prices. But that measure of “core” inflation also slipped slightly in recent months, from a 1.5% annual advance in October to 1.3% in December.

"The easing could reflect a pass-through from lower transportation costs to other products. It also could show that the relative strength of the U.S. economy has boosted the value of the dollar, allowing consumers to pay less for foreign-made goods beyond petroleum.

"The latest readings could reinforce the lack of urgency for the Fed to raise short-term interest rates despite steady job creation. Officials last week said they “can be patient in beginning to normalize the stance of monetary policy.”

"Some economists are questioning whether the slower price gains represent a temporary blip or deeper causes, such as a weakening global economy.

“I’m not sure you can call it transitory” when consumer inflation has been below 2% for nearly three years, said Wells Fargo chief economist John Silvia. “When you look at Europe and you look at China, you have a global economy that’s growing much less you would have expected two or three years ago.”

"Weak global growth slackens demand for oil and other commodities and has a downward effect on prices for U.S. consumers.

"Typically, as the economy heats up the Fed raises rates. The central bank’s rate target today remains at the ultra-low levels established during the depths of the recession, despite economic growth showing signs of accelerating over the last three quarters of 2014."


http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2015...-away-from-fed-target-since-2009/?mod=WSJBlog
 
The Fed realizes that if it does not raise rates now, it will never be able to do so and will have no ammo but more (ineffective) QE the next time a recession (is recognized) hits.

It has to raise if it hopes a cut will help in the future.
 
The Fed realizes that if it does not raise rates now, it will never be able to do so and will have no ammo but more (ineffective) QE the next time a recession (is recognized) hits.

It has to raise if it hopes a cut will help in the future.
It's a good thing they're in this position. Next recession the supply-side option, "pushing a rope", will be off the table.
 
Please explain.
They will be unable to make money any cheaper or more plentiful than it already is at the top of the food chain, so a supply-side, trickle-down, wealth effect strategy won't (shouldn't) be considered. Inadequate demand will be impossible to ignore.

However, central banks elsewhere are trying de facto negative interest rates, so maybe I'm being too optimistic.
 
And who will buy its vast amount of assets that will lose value with every rate rise? Honest question...


The Fed realizes that if it does not raise rates now, it will never be able to do so and will have no ammo but more (ineffective) QE the next time a recession (is recognized) hits.

It has to raise if it hopes a cut will help in the future.
 
My guess is that the fed will just buy as many bonds as it can until they own as much of the debt as it feasibly can, and then they decide they have another bright idea and they cancel the debt of the gov't that the fed owns. There have already been rumblings along this line and given they had the idea of the trillion dollar coin to increase the public debt that they were pushing, the idea of canceling the debt seems tame in comparison. When the time comes, it will seem quite logical and rational.

The only problem is it will show that the narrative they have been pushing all along that qe was just open mkt operations and not monetizing the debt will be shown for the fraud it always was. Then everyone will know that the whole qe thing was just an excuse for a few men to sit in the eccles building and print money willy nilly any time they felt like goosing the markets.

Who knows how the currency mkt would take it. If were rational, I don't think it would want anything to do with a currency that's being abused in this manner.
 
that would indeed be the coup of the life time (or even bigger). Making the world believe that the US government is indeed not printing money through the back door (of course any such deal would involve government debt and hence the borrower). Hmm, I totally believe the Jewish financial community in New York can pull this off.

My guess is that the fed will just buy as many bonds as it can until they own as much of the debt as it feasibly can, and then they decide they have another bright idea and they cancel the debt of the gov't that the fed owns. There have already been rumblings along this line and given they had the idea of the trillion dollar coin to increase the public debt that they were pushing, the idea of canceling the debt seems tame in comparison. When the time comes, it will seem quite logical and rational.

The only problem is it will show that the narrative they have been pushing all along that qe was just open mkt operations and not monetizing the debt will be shown for the fraud it always was. Then everyone will know that the whole qe thing was just an excuse for a few men to sit in the eccles building and print money willy nilly any time they felt like goosing the markets.

Who knows how the currency mkt would take it. If were rational, I don't think it would want anything to do with a currency that's being abused in this manner.
 
And who will buy its vast amount of assets that will lose value with every rate rise? Honest question...

Oh no, you've followed me....am I that interesting to you?

The Fed doesn't have to sell anything. It can just take a loss. Just like the ECB will do.
 
Back
Top