The failure of liberalism can be summed up in 1 quote from Obama.

Quote from Max E. Pad:

“If there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try,”

-Barack Obama


This single quote is the main reason why liberals, and far left thinking are so destructive. When it comes down to it, you cant save everyone but liberals will take up almost any cause that shits on the majority of people in order to save a select few. Basically what obama said is the antithesis of freedom.

Look around, even outside of the gun debate, and you will see that liberals have created an environment whereby they are unilaterally taking away our freedom, all under the premise that we have to watch out for that 1 person who might be saved.

I dropped my nephew off for school recently, the same elementary school i went too, and was shocked to see that they had torn down the out door hockey rink. Apparently some kid lost an eye, only one in 50 years, so the hockey rink had to go. Screw excercise, screw fun, one kid got hurt, so everyone has to suffer.

I often wonder what kind of life the a-holes who live by obama's mantra live, you are more likely to be struck by lightning than die by the hands of an AR15, how do these people even leave their house when they are that scared?

Liberals are slowly moving us into a society that is the equivalent of a padded room, all in the name of "saving that one person" as obama would say.

So we shouldn't try to save a life? WTF is wrong with you fucked up righties? Dropped on your heads when you were small?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

So we shouldn't try to save a life? WTF is wrong with you fucked up righties? Dropped on your heads when you were small?

40k people die in car accidents every year, a fatality rate that is exponentially higher than that of gun deathds, if we set the speed limit to 5 miles per hour none of these people will die, do you believe we should lower the speed limit to 5 miles per hour? If we do lower the speed limit to five miles per hour what is the opportunity cost to everyone living within that economy?

It doesnt surprise me that you are incapable of thinking for yourself.
 
Quote from Ricter:

So if some being like a genie gave you a choice, kill one little kid, yours for example, and cancer will be eliminated worldwide forever, would you say yes? I would.

i dunno, i think i'd wish for a white unicorn, preferably the kind that can fly. :D Or maybe that all the fraudulent politicians and their anti-American sympathizers magically teleported to N Korea where they belong.

c'mon bro that is just not applicable to this thread.. err anything really.
 
Quote from Max E. Pad:

40k people die in car accidents every year, a fatality rate that is exponentially higher than that of gun deathds, if we set the speed limit to 5 miles per hour none of these people will die, do you believe we should lower the speed limit to 5 miles per hour? If we do lower the speed limit to five miles per hour what is the opportunity cost to everyone living within that economy?

It doesnt surprise me that you are incapable of thinking for yourself.

This is what he said

“If there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try,”

-Barack Obama

He didn't say " We should try to save one life no matter what it costs"

That's you in your hysteria reading into it. He just said we have an obligation to do something even if it saves just one life.

So as usual,another moron righty simply has a comprehension problem coupled with a tendency toward paranoia, irrationality and hysteria.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

i dunno, i think i'd wish for a white unicorn, preferably the kind that can fly. :D Or maybe that all the fraudulent politicians and their anti-American sympathizers magically teleported to N Korea where they belong.

c'mon bro that is just not applicable to this thread.. err anything really.
It's actually a classic philosophical problem directly related to this thread. It does not have an easy answer, which I think you picked up on, if only instinctively. : )
 
Quote from Ricter:

It's actually a classic philosophical problem directly related to this thread. It does not have an easy answer, which I think you picked up on, if only instinctively. : )

There is no perfect set of rules or laws that will keep everyone from dying, and we are ALL going to die anyway. In the meantime you should live as YOU see fit and not have a group of fallible people who think otherwise making decisions that effect your life, for you.

The question itself is completely theoretical and doesn't apply to life in any way.. but I'll play along. I would leave it up to the child.. his life, his choice. I wouldn't mention this decision to him until I felt he was old enough to understand it completely and I would respect his decision either way. It isn't the parents place to make that decision for him/her.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:



This reminds me of the the video posted here of that nasty whore in Tampa who had like 20 kids from 8 guys and was whining that "someone needs to pay for all this".. bitch, we already ARE! You're supposed to pay for YOUR fucking kids! "But what about the poow yittle children?" Yeah now WE all have to pay for them. The point is if she never got money for kid #1 there wouldn't have been kid #2 and certainly not #20.

I have no sympathy for these people, and I can't believe that's where part of my taxes go.

Think about this, we have money stolen from us (taxes) and given to scumbags like this so they will vote for politicians that we don't agree with. I'm just not living like this forever.

Think about it this way . . . in the future , if some terrorist organization or rogue country decided to attack the US, and if you were all old and frail and fuckedup , maybe,just maybe, it will be that nasty whore's children who will put their lives on the line to save your haggidy ass.
 
Quote from Spike Trader:

Think about it this way . . . in the future , if some terrorist organization or rogue country decided to attack the US, and if you were all old and frail and fuckedup , maybe,just maybe, it will be that nasty whore's children who will put their lives on the line to save your haggidy ass.

Not surprisingly, you missed the point of the post. It wasn't about the kids but the parents.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

Not surprisingly, you missed the point of the post. It wasn't about the kids but the parents.


Read above where you write '' In the meantime you should live as YOU see fit and not have a group of fallible people who think otherwise making decisions that effect(affect) your life,for you''

That woman is living her own life.
 
Quote from Spike Trader:

Read above where you write '' In the meantime you should live as YOU see fit and not have a group of fallible people who think otherwise making decisions that effect(affect) your life,for you''

That woman is living her own life.

No she isn't, we're paying for her kids, and she's living off the money. If we don't have to support her with our taxes then fine, have as many as you want. And yes I know some people actually need the money, but there is no excuse for this women having 20 kids when she can't support 1, or anyone having kids that they aren't even trying to support. They do it for money, you know it, I know it. I'm saying fuck that.
 
Back
Top