G gkishot Jul 10, 2016 #2 nitro said: Is believing in backtesting blindly View attachment 165238 View attachment 165239 http://datagrid.lbl.gov/backtest/#run More... Depends on the time frame.
nitro said: Is believing in backtesting blindly View attachment 165238 View attachment 165239 http://datagrid.lbl.gov/backtest/#run More... Depends on the time frame.
I indicator777 Jul 27, 2016 #4 Simple mean reversion strats perform nicely in last 15 years. Don't get distracted by academic types.
Simple mean reversion strats perform nicely in last 15 years. Don't get distracted by academic types.
stevegee58 Jul 27, 2016 #5 indicator777 said: Simple mean reversion strats perform nicely in last 15 years. Don't get distracted by academic types. More... Heh. I just backtested the WR2 and IBS systems since they were very simple to code and I hadn't heard of them before. Kind of amazing. Both have 68% win rates, and positive expectancy.
indicator777 said: Simple mean reversion strats perform nicely in last 15 years. Don't get distracted by academic types. More... Heh. I just backtested the WR2 and IBS systems since they were very simple to code and I hadn't heard of them before. Kind of amazing. Both have 68% win rates, and positive expectancy.