Excellent... thank you.
So its still intuitive. A locked-down non-immune population is basically still subject to to a blow up in numbers depending on how it is reopened.
If you reopen some people are going to lose their lives that would not otherwise under lock-down. If you remain locked-down you risk catastrophic financial harm to a large portion of the population.
This is why I don't like being in charge. Who wants to make those kind of decisions? I don't mind being chief engineer or something technical but don't expect me to make those kind of people decisions. Its life or death and I'm lucky if my socks match.
A good leader accepts that some challenges are tough to make. But someone has to do it.
I have to lay off close to 50 people in our organization in the next month - part of why I've been so pissy lately. I hate having to do this to people, families over some stupid scare that is way way overblown. I don't equate this decision to something Trump has to make but when you lead you have to do so in the bad times as well as the good. Anyone can make decisions in good times. True character makes the ones in the bad, and accepts responsibility for those decisions when they were wrong (something Trump is miserable at, by the way).
Its also why I get mad about all these "models". Not a one considers the downside to the economy in the equation. Its all about the virus. These are one sided equations.
How can you have a decision made when you only consider half of the equation? And that is exactly what we have done.