The Evangelical Roots of Our Post-Truth Society

[futurecurrents]

At the risk of being swept into the vortex, I shall tip toe a bit around the rim.

Re:
1 & 2. Neither Man made CO2 causing warming nor a pathway from non-life to life, are, however, precluded by your observations. My view on 1. is different. I am satisfied that the science is now quite convincing that current warming is not caused primarily by CO2, and that reducing CO2 emission, though not a bad thing to do, will have little effect on global temperature.

Re 2. You have never understood that most scientists who are working on evolution hpotheses have long ago rejected the idea of random encounters alone being responsible for evolution of life forms. You'll be overjoyed to learn that there is more and more evidence building that the process of evolution takes place far more rapidly, at least in some prominent cases, than was originally thought possible. In the case of man, it is currently thought that man himself affected his own evolutionary rate. But of course if this is possible for man, it is also possible for lower organism.

Imagine, and accept, that the rate of evolution, is not linear but increases with time and you'll have no further problem .

Regarding your response to 1&2.

And yet every expert climate scientist on earth - with NONE denying it - thinks that CO2 IS the main reason for the sudden rise in temps and CO2 is certainly a greenhouse gas and we have certainly raised it's level by 40%.

So how can that NOT cause warming? I'm satisfied that you are either intellectually corrupt piece of shit working for a libertarian think tank or you are ninety and going senile and haven't read any of the science since 1960. Or both. Either way, you are one fucked up dude.

I'm going with think tank social media operative. What they call a Trojan horse. Rather odd that you abandon logic and science on this one issue. It is an important one for the Koch bros et al.

Now we wait for your huge pile of impressive sounding but ultimately wrong verbal spewage to hit the speech to text software.

 

[jem]

1. there are thousands of skeptical climate scientists.

here are 1350 peer revieed skeptical papers...
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

2. change in ocean temps lead change in air temps which lead changes in co2 with a 90% correlation.

the change is co2 levels is most likely cause by the change in ocean temps. it would take a boatload of really good science to show the laggard created the cause.

thinking man made co2 caused warming without any peer reviewed science showing that is faith based.

Regarding your response to 1&2.

And yet every expert climate scientist on earth - with NONE denying it - thinks that CO2 IS the main reason for the sudden rise in temps and CO2 is certainly a greenhouse gas and we have certainly raised it's level by 40%.

So how can that NOT cause warming? I'm satisfied that you are either intellectually corrupt piece of shit working for a libertarian think tank or you are ninety and going senile and haven't read any of the science since 1960. Or both. Either way, you are one fucked up dude.

I'm going with think tank social media operative. What they call a Trojan horse. Rather odd that you abandon logic and science on this one issue. It is an important one for the Koch bros et al.

Now we wait for your huge pile of impressive sounding but ultimately wrong verbal spewage to hit the speech to text software.

 

[piezoe]

And yet every expert climate scientist on earth - with NONE denying it - thinks that CO2 IS the main reason for the sudden rise in temps

But unfortunately this is simply untrue. And you yourself know the names of prominent scientists that work in the field of climate science, atmospheric physics , or meteorology that are either unsure about the role CO2 plays or believe CO2 is not the main reason for temperature rise.

 

[java]

misconception, about evolution, question is when and what makes life from non life and does it evolve over time or is it a sudden event and then you can go to a book and call the cause whatever they call it. In case I accidentally used any trigger words, when does iron come to life? Or is it already alive?

 

[futurecurrents]

But unfortunately this is simply untrue. And you yourself know the names of prominent scientists that work in the field of climate science, atmospheric physics , or meteorology that are either unsure about the role CO2 plays or believe CO2 is not the main reason for temperature rise.

NO PUBLISHING CLIMATE SCIENTIST DENIES MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING VIA CO2. IF THERE WAS IT SHOULD BE EASY TO FIND A SINGLE QUOTE,PAPER SUMMARY ETC. FROM THEM SAYING SO. YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.

Do you sit in room with the other operatives or do you work from home?

 

[piezoe]

NO PUBLISHING CLIMATE SCIENTIST DENIES MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING VIA CO2. IF THERE WAS IT SHOULD BE EASY TO FIND A SINGLE QUOTE,PAPER SUMMARY ETC. FROM THEM SAYING SO. YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.

Do you sit in room with the other operatives or do you work from home?

Your post is laughable. I don't know how many peer reviewed papers there are that call into question the Hansen Hypothesis, but it is surely in the hundreds by now. I'll simply call your attention to Lindzen's important 1994 paper published in Environmental Pollution. Lindzen is retired from MIT now, but he remains an internationally recognized Meteorologist and one of many Prominent Scientists who have published widely on the many defects in "Hansen's Catastrophic Global Warming Hypothesis". Unfortunately Environmental Pollution is an Elsevier journal, so you'll have to pay if you want to to download the complete PDF file. But you can read the abstract for free. Or if you have a have a large University Library near, you can probably copy the paper for a buck or two. see: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0269749194900302?via=ihub

 

[jem]

1000s of scientists are skeptical and many have published papers showing the sun and the tides are responsible for some or all of the warming we experience.

your statement reverses how science is done.

there is no peer reviewed sciences showing man made co2 causes warming.
There are myraid peer reviewed papers showing the sun and or the tides are responsible for some or all the warming.

you have the burden of showing rising co2 is not just a trailing impact of a warming ocean.

NO PUBLISHING CLIMATE SCIENTIST DENIES MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING VIA CO2. IF THERE WAS IT SHOULD BE EASY TO FIND A SINGLE QUOTE,PAPER SUMMARY ETC. FROM THEM SAYING SO. YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.

Do you sit in room with the other operatives or do you work from home?