The Empire Is Coming For Tulsi Gabbard

Tsing Tao said:
I'm genuinely curious here, H2M so humor me if you would.

You position yourself as someone who is against corruption, against the machine and for the little person. So a candidate comes along - on your side of the aisle, mind you - who seems to push for this and you shit on her every chance you get. What gives? Do you just not like her?
More...

Pro Gabbard is not in the contract.
 
Tsing Tao said:
I'm genuinely curious here, H2M so humor me if you would.

You position yourself as someone who is against corruption, against the machine and for the little person. So a candidate comes along - on your side of the aisle, mind you - who seems to push for this and you shit on her every chance you get. What gives? Do you just not like her?
More...

Find her completely disingenuous and her crossover appeal unwarranted and tied to her looks/service, as nothing she's said is "original" and just mirrors other democrat's stances.

Let me follow up with a question of my own. Being a Libertarian, how do you align w/someone who endorsed Bernie, yet oppose a much more moderate Hillary?
 
Last edited:
Here4money said:
Find her completely disingenuous and her crossover appeal unwarranted and tied to her looks/service, as nothing she's said is "original" and just mirrors other democrat's stances.
More...

So then, you are not bothered by the fact that she is a Russian agent?
 
Here4money said:
Find her completely disingenuous and her crossover appeal unwarranted and tied to her looks/service, as nothing she's said is "original" and just mirrors other democrat's stances.

Let me follow up with a question of my own. Being a Libertarian, how do you align w/someone who endorsed Bernie, yet oppose a much more moderate Hillary?
More...

First, I don't think she's being disingenuous. And I certainly couldn't care less how she looks.

I tend to gravitate towards individuals who I believe - not always accurately, mind you - are sincere about battling corruption and the DC Machine, the so-called Deep State. If they can take on Wall Street and the corrupt SEC, tackle buy backs, and smash the Fed, all the better. I voted for Obama, because he ran on that. Of course he ended up being the very thing the machine loved, and that's why I didn't vote for him the second time. Trump, same thing - although there was a SCOTUS consideration in that, too. But Trump has fallen way, way short of his position pre-election as well. So I'd love to get an opportunity to vote for someone who is more sincere about going after the stuff I mentioned. Tulsi seems legit on that front.
 
Tulsi hits the gym.

upload_2019-11-6_10-24-21.jpeg


upload_2019-11-6_10-23-38.jpeg


upload_2019-11-6_10-23-50.jpeg

upload_2019-11-6_10-24-3.jpeg


images
 
Here4money said:
At least their campaign is honest about their sexploitation. Once again proving my point
More...

Not really. She is shamelessly demonstrating that she is sufficiently fit to go out on the hunt and kill something and bring it home.

Thus distinguishing herself from some of the very notable contenders in the dem primary and from Trump, at least in the physical fitness aspect. No question that voters are weighing that as a factor. You just see a sexploitation thing from the lower realms where you dwell.

In contrast, you and your ilk would self-stimulate when Obama found it convenient to be seen working out and showing his bod at the beach. Yeh, you lapped that up.

If Hillary enters the race, you probably won't see her on any surfboards in a swimsuit, and I would like to thank her in advance for that. But also would definitely need to do something to indicate that she can up from a chair without her Visiting Angel, Chelsea, at her side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top