Quote from rossmedia:
As trading becomes increasingly more statistical in nature one must acknowledge the birth of another question, what is the nature of statistics? I am rapidly approaching an interesting conclusionâ¦emotions.
The general belief that systematic, analytic models are less emotional than discretionary trading is fundamentally flawed. Statistics, in any discipline, are a 2nd mover...the 1st being the cumulative human actions that stats must, per se, be based upon. So then stats, probabilities and the like simply quantify the most ubiquitous element of human nature, emotions. This suggest that equations, assessments, and even math itself is deeply rooted in emotions, for without such they cannot noticeably exist.
The math market, or stock market as many prefer to call it, is the finest example of mathematical emotions. Black boxes simply do a better job, at times, at recognizing the patterns of past emotions without compounding trading decisions with the convolution of real-time emotions. The vacuum of code then is advantageous because it minimizes the indecision or delay oneâs nervous system causes even for the most robotic of traders.
A moderate embracing of our emotions as traders may result in more profitable trading than ignoring the same to become more âroboticâ, for even robots have human creators.
The stock market has no abstractions, or haphazard components, only actions and re-actions that are perceived as such to the mechanically bent trader.
Any suggestions, disagreements, and thoughts are very much welcomed.
-Ross