The Economist: ‘Open Society’ Advocates Are ‘Narcissistic Cosmopolitans’
- Thread starter qxr1011
- Start date
Breitbart!!! hahahahaha
Nobody will click on that, preach to your choir.
Nobody will click on that, preach to your choir.
Open society is founded by Soros and The Economist is owned by a Soros family member. One world government is their goal. To achieve that, they have to do or propagate these:
- Controlling the media
- Feminism
- SJW
- Globalist
- Islamisation/immigration
- Open borders
- Politically correct
and many more.
- Controlling the media
- Feminism
- SJW
- Globalist
- Islamisation/immigration
- Open borders
- Politically correct
and many more.
Last edited:
I have no idea why Alex Jones has not yet self-euthanized to end his pain. It remains a mystery.
It is just a show to him, his ex-wife has said that. He sees the fans as a joke, it is hilarious, but mostly to him.
Guys like carrer are very fortunate they live in massive abundance (and still complain about taxes or whatever I'm sure.. boo hoo). In much of the world they would starve to death being such fruit loops.
Well, he had to say that to appear "stable" in the custody battle with his wife. Who knows where his "art" ends and his "reality" begins? I'm not sure even he knows.
Perhaps there are voices somewhere in the ether that can explain it. Perhaps he's listening to them right now.
if any of the drones had the desire to read the article in the economist you would know that it focusing on open borders at least initially. And it was breitbart citing the economist.
and I note that freedie picture was classic 1984 style nuspeak. Not being Open to Soros and his dictates... does not make one a totalitarian.
In fact being open to "international goverance" as soros preaches would leave a nations citizens open to totalitarian rule from afar.
The totalitarians are at both ends of the spectrum... Soro's side and China's side.
and I note that freedie picture was classic 1984 style nuspeak. Not being Open to Soros and his dictates... does not make one a totalitarian.
In fact being open to "international goverance" as soros preaches would leave a nations citizens open to totalitarian rule from afar.
The totalitarians are at both ends of the spectrum... Soro's side and China's side.