The Democratic Immigration Plan To Destroy America

[Cuddles]

Powerful bong, eh? So it is Jones. Don’t know enough about him to comment. The subjects that are in play are:

1. The Democrat plan to attract and subsidize immigrants at taxpayer expense for political gain.

2. You inability to counter Scataphago’s post expect through a irrelevant and pathetic meme.

If you want to talk about Alex Jones and his network, may I suggest you look for people who know him and care.

Hey poopydeek, you’ll be up for a nick change again and soon, I suspect. After all, is not “Poopy” a kid’s word for “Shit” and “Deek” how a young child might say “Dick”? So in what circumstance might someone have a shit covered dick?

Nice avatar, though.

I have little patience and limited time to read inane diatribes or opinions not backed by facts and sources. I don't know why anyone would.

Sorry, if infowars peddles the worst garbage on the net, I'm not giving them the time of day for the same reason I never bother to waste my time reading a tabloid.

I also think it's cute that you and Vanz would accuse people of being pot heads, as if someone who's never touched the stuff would be incapable of seeing the benefit of legalization.

 

[Scataphagos]

For some reason, I associate Alex Jones with sensational, end of the world stories, with emphasis on sensationalism versus balance. Please share with us reasons why Alex Jones is worth our time. Please be detailed and specific. Thanks.

I'd heard others dissing Infowars before the first time I went to the site. Decided I look around and make up my own mind.

Some of his stories ARE sensational... things you don't hear elsewhere... yet true nonetheless. Like I said, I've found "his" stories on other sites as well. So "sensational" or not, still as credible as other. Too many people are narrow-minded and simply "shoot the messenger" first thing.

I think Alex Jones is waaaay more credible than perceived by some... and you're likely doing yourself a disfavor by dismissing him out of hand.

Think about it.... if Jones/Inforwars were consistently inaccurate or outright false, how long could he stay in business? If such were the case, wouldn't people tire of having smoke blown up their skirt and stop patronizing the site?

 

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

Sorry, you peddle the worst garbage on the net, I'm not giving you the time of day for the same reason I never bother to waste my time reading a tabloid.

I also think it's cute that you and Vanz would accuse people of being pot heads, as if someone who's never touched the stuff would be incapable of seeing the benefit of legalization.

In other words, you are bugging out because you can’t keep up with my fact based retorts of the propaganda you post daily. As readers may note, I almost never have started a politically based thread. Almost all of my politically based posts are to address various manipulations, fallacies, lies, and mischaracterizations by Leftist poster that are an attempt to mislead people into making decisions that go against their own best interests.

You have over 15,800 posts since Dec 8, 2016, soon after Hillary was defeated, for what purpose? You have never retracted anything, that I’ve seen, where you were obviously wrong. In fact, you have even doubled down. So again I ask, what is your opinion of the following people or organizations:

1. Jussie Smollett
2. Michael Avenatti
3. Cristina Blasely Ford
4. ANTIFA

You will not answer these questions because it pins you down and you are at least smart enough to fear my followup questions.

As far as pot is concerned, the downsides greatly outweigh the benefits. Unless, of course, you personally know better than most governments of the world. Duh. Thinking about it, I now pray, for your sake, that you actually smoke pot.

Bottom line, your massive and sustained dump of propagandist garbage will continue to be responded to with facts and principles, by someone who does not have all day to spend on the internet because of his several jobs, myself. As far as others who spend their time countering your efforts, I salute them.

 

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

I'd heard others dissing Infowars before the first time I went to the site. Decided I look around and make up my own mind.

Some of his stories ARE sensational... things you don't hear elsewhere... yet true nonetheless. Like I said, I've found "his" stories on other sites as well. So "sensational" or not, still as credible as other. Too many people are narrow-minded and simply "shoot the messenger" first thing.

I think Alex Jones is waaaay more credible than perceived by some... and you're likely doing yourself a disfavor by dismissing him out of hand.

Think about it.... if Jones/Inforwars were consistently inaccurate or outright false, how long could he stay in business? If such were the case, wouldn't people tire of having smoke blown up their skirt and stop patronizing the site?

I will look up Alex Jones. However, your argument could be better: After all, aren’t there people still watching CNN, MSNBC, etc?

 

[Cuddles]

In other words, you are bugging out because you can’t keep up with my fact based retorts of the propaganda you post daily. As readers may note, I almost never have started a politically based thread. Almost all of my politically based posts are to address various manipulations, fallacies, lies, and mischaracterizations by Leftist poster that are an attempt to mislead people into making decisions that go against their own best interests.

You have over 15,800 posts since Dec 8, 2016, soon after Hillary was defeated, for what purpose? You have never retracted anything, that I’ve seen, where you were obviously wrong. In fact, you have even doubled down. So again I ask, what is your opinion of the following people or organizations:

1. Jussie Smollett
2. Michael Avenatti
3. Cristina Blasely Ford
4. ANTIFA

You will not answer these questions because it pins you down and you are at least smart enough to fear my followup questions.

As far as pot is concerned, the downsides greatly outweigh the benefits. Unless, of course, you personally know better than most governments of the world. Duh. Thinking about it, I now pray, for your sake, that you actually smoke pot.

Bottom line, your massive and sustained dump of propagandist garbage will continue to be responded to with facts and principles, by someone who does not have all day to spend on the internet because of his several jobs, myself. As far as others who spend their time countering your efforts, I salute them.

by "you" i was addressing infowars, I see my correction was too late & as expected, took it as a personal attack.

 

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

by "you" i was addressing infowars, I see my correction was too late & as expected, took it as a personal attack.

No worries. Care to give us your current opinion on the people I’ve listed above?

 

[Scataphagos]

I will look up Alex Jones. However, your argument could be better: After all, aren’t there people still watching CNN, MSNBC, etc?

Don't we hear "false story" and "fake news revealed" about CNN, MSNBC, others from time-to-time/often? Though some people expect Infowars to be "fake and sensational", I have yet to see an example of that.

I'm not trying to make make an argument for Jones/Infowars. I do however mostly refute negative claims about them. They are pro USA, pro Constitution... many other sources of news are anything but. I can see how someone who has been "conditioned" to MSM propaganda might see Jones as "sensationalist". As for me, just a source of information.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

 

[RRY16]

I'd heard others dissing Infowars before the first time I went to the site. Decided I look around and make up my own mind.

Some of his stories ARE sensational... things you don't hear elsewhere... yet true nonetheless. Like I said, I've found "his" stories on other sites as well. So "sensational" or not, still as credible as other. Too many people are narrow-minded and simply "shoot the messenger" first thing.

I think Alex Jones is waaaay more credible than perceived by some... and you're likely doing yourself a disfavor by dismissing him out of hand.

Think about it.... if Jones/Inforwars were consistently inaccurate or outright false, how long could he stay in business? If such were the case, wouldn't people tire of having smoke blown up their skirt and stop patronizing the site?

Think about what? He’s basically done. Let everyone know how you feel about Sandy Hook.

 

[Cuddles]

No worries. Care to give us your current opinion on the people I’ve listed above?

not really, as you said, i've got over 15k posts and have chimed with my opinion in those threads.