I saw the phone pic caps with the "blotted" out portion and while it looked nice, I recognized it as IB TWS, and it certainly can be run in sim mode. I don't really know who is for real here, but I'd like to think some here or in the past on ET are legit successful traders making at least over 100k a year. I would guess a more solid proof could come with broker statements with personal info redacted, but at least identifying an account number, and then permission given to the broker to verify them on a phone call or something.
I have a similar sentiment and experience with scam trading products and gurus. If I cut off all the time wasted with them, I could have shaved off at least five years of stumbling around, being fooled and still not reaching break even. tradingschools.org opened my eyes to the severity and pervasiveness of the out of control snake oil trading product & vendor scam industry and is my goto place for a chuckle at the next scam exposed.
Al Brooks and others often like to use the 20 EMA for more immediate trend but I guess the 200 can still work as a higher time frame and seems to be used with long term position chart reading. The RSI could be used to check for strength and may help with divergences. Just my opinion, but the s/r looks so cluttered. Maybe just use hi & low & close of yesterday and maybe R2 & S2 for early reversal signs. But then again, I barely tried s/r lines only for a short while, and moved on quickly. If you learn to read patterns like from AlBrooks or Bulkowski(
www.thepatternsite.com), you can also look on more recent swing hi's/lo's as target or s/r areas without having to draw lines.