The Current State of Matrox

I have a background in computer hardware and have always been fond of Matrox and turned into a big fan when my G400 32mb dual head came. I recently purchased of a dual head G450 16mb ddr video card which I am quite happy with, but what holds for the future of Matrox....

Straight from Matroxusers.com

News item posted at 4:54 GMT by VigilAnt
The last editorial has benefitted me with many responses and I appreciate every one. I have just got this in my inbox, and I would like to share it with you. Before you read, be aware that I have confirmed what was written before and had planned on writing about this as well. Since I got the email, I thought this would be the prime time to attack it.


*snip*

while I don't really care much anymore for matrox..
the company, *snip*

the people there are great though.. the best bunch of guys I ever worked with..

*Snip*

in the last set of lay-offs most of the support was decimated.. there is no longer a hardware
compatibility test group.. software testing (driver, apps, etc) is reduced to about 10 people
as usual the end user support trees were chopped.. marketing, sales, and eng. were left
untouched.. luckily tsup managed not to get cut this time..
Unfortunately Haig, and the customers are the ones who are going to suffer again since
his support tree is almost gone..

why is matrox failing..

Financially most people haven't got raises there in about 3 years, paid overtime stopped 2 years
ago, no more bonuses..and they cut all benefits by about 30% morale in the place is at the bottom. if you're still working
there it's because you just waiting for the severance package..and that's the attitude most people have there
Yet the owners donate 20million to a local university in this time of financial decline..

why is parhelia doing so poorly.. I think back to a converstation I had with one of the chief HW engs.
his quote "Most company's have a dartboard that represent that market.. we throw the dart then draw the circles"
marketing could never make up their mind what market the product would sell to.. each week they changed their
minds. so the testing/fixing priorities would keep shifting.. hence you have a product that's mediocre in all categories

Marketing doesn't talk to the outside world.. they believe that they have an inate knowledge of the products people
want.. hence we have 20 people programming "e-dualhead" and such cutting edge technology like
max headroom.. rather than working on OGL code..

Re-investment in RD is almost NIL.. if you look at anand's review of inside NVidia.. they day it was released on the
web.. matrox's asic, and HW eng teams unanimously agreed... company is finshed.. they need to invest
close to 500million to have the same setup.. if they did invest in that equipment then. parhelia would have been
released on time.. which was about 2 years ago.. it's not liek we didn't try.. we asked for and FIB machine
repeatedly starting about 4 years ago...

many good projects were dropped.. ex: video in a chipset.. they would have released it before intel.. but
it was pulled.. at 90% completion!!!! it was already taped out!! and they stopped the chip run..because
at the end they didn't think it was viable.. they even dropped the second stage low power north bridge with
video for laptops..

production goof ups.. Overproduction when it's not needed..forgetting to order parts.. hence too many 4x parhelias, and they won't sell the 8X
until the 4X is gone.. while the 8X is only 20% faster but it fixes pretty much all the problems people
are seeing in the 4X..

expierience.. there are only about 50 people in matrox that have been there more than 5 years, with the last
layoff that number has dropped, most of the guys who design the chip, and are writing the drivers have less than 3 year
expierience in doing this.. hence you always have less performance per clock than the competition.
and they don't have a single analog asic eng.. so when it comes to timings inside the asic, they always miss.
that's been the clocking issues since the G450.. and they're not willing to pay the required salary to hire this
type of engineer..

This pretty much sums up what needs fixing there (all of the mangagement).. anyone you ask will agree..


Sad times for those involved in my eyes. The root of some of their problems are left untouched while the parts that make the company grow and thrive are chopped. When/will they ever get it? One thing that was left out in that email was that many department managers have left without even having a job first.

If Matrox Graphics is to turn things around, they need to first realize that what they have been calling business as usual for the last years is not the right path. I agree completely with the sender's comment about the target and the dart. It fits so well with what I have learned about them.
 
man, if it's true it really sucks.

for trading, matrox is the only act in town. (and no, i'm not going drop $1000 or more for an appian card). matrox stuff works, and it works very, very well. matrox tech support is also the BEST i've ever experienced in the business. they get back to you in 20min or less when you post a question or problem in their forums (i've never even had to call them b/c they respond so quickly).

nvidia's dual display stuff is a total failure under win2k (you can only "stretch" your display across multiple monitors, unlike with matrox where each display is truly unique and separate) for trading purposes. it may be great for playing quake, but it's useless for business app's due to their failure to develop drivers that can run multi-monitors under win2k...

anyway, i think matrox is great, and i will continue to buy their products until i'm convinced that the above is no longer true.
 
matrox g400's are the best video card I've ever used.. big matrox fan here... have tried all the others, with mixed results... nothing's out-done matrox so far, just like sony's best for monitors ...

matrox is excellent .. I'm never buying another ati card again I know that ...my radeon 7000 all in wonder is now a paperweight since it can't co-exist with Any other video cards on the same pc. wish they'd said that on the box.

anyone use the latest matrox cards, eg the quads (g550)?


thx..
 
I agree with Ken that Matrox are the best multi-monitors video card. Already have try other product, but these cards have a lot of problems that you will never see with Matrox. Maybe Matrox are not the most performer in other video area, but for multi-monitor they are the leader for the moment.
 
Originally posted by bungrider
man, if it's true it really sucks.

for trading, matrox is the only act in town...
Yes. I own 5 Matrox multi-monitor cards. Current, I am running in one machine the G550 Dual DVI, and two G200 MMS Quads for a total support of ten monitors. Now get THIS - I have ONE driver running all these cards - everything works out of the box. It is childs play for me to go from six monitors that I have now to 10 monitors. I did this all for less than $1000.

It would be one sad day if Matrox bit the dust...

nitro :(
 
Originally posted by nitro



It would be one sad day if Matrox bit the dust...

nitro :(

not as half as sad as the day nitro stopped posting on here:(
I mean who would after all keep us tip top on supermicro et al:cool:
 
Back
Top