Still waiting for your point of your original reply to me.............you sure are shucking and jiving to avoid that aren't you?
By the way, you probably want to take a look at the definition of "ad hominem", it doesn't mean what you appear to think it means.
The actual definition is "a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument". It's not the "get out of jail free" trump card that you throw down any time your position is demonstrated to be unsupportable, as you and so many others here appear to think. It's actually not even a personal attack per se. I could say you're a stupid stupid dumb dumb and that would be a personal attack but not necessarily an ad hominem attack unless that was my justification for my underlying position.
For example, say you made a rational and coherent argument about why elected officials in democracies err on the side of caution in epidemics and I provided an argumentative and meaningless answer. Then when asked what my point was replied "Looks like you'll need to read it again for the point...cut down the projection and persnickety reactions and maybe you'll find it." then I would certainly be deflecting and avoiding taking responsibility for my answer, but I wouldn't quite yet be engaged in an ad hominem attack. If you replied with "In other words, you have no clue what your point was. Noted.", then you'd just be correctly pointing out the current situation, since I was clearly unable to state my point. Now if I then responded with "No, your ego is too big and your reasoning ability is too small so you're only left with ad hominems, apparently." then that would be an ad hominem attack! At that point I would have abandoned all pretenses of a genuine discussion of the topic at hand, instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument. Quite literally the definition of ad hominem.
Sound familiar? Heck, you've provided close to a textbook example of an ad hominem attack right here in this thread. Not to mention the fact that you ended your ad hominem attacks with an accusation that I was engaged in an ad hominem attack! That's a level of blatant projection the likes of which is seldom seen in the wild! Congratulations, you're providing spectacular examples of obnoxious behavior that most people have too much pride to attach even a pseudonym to.
Nope. Statements like "you have no clue what your point was" are attacks on an "attribute of the person making the argument." That's a "to the man" argument which is the literal meaning of the term in Latin. You're making a bald assumption and nothing more.
The rest of your 5 paragraphs (including more ad homs) can be dealt with by a single quote:
"The capacity of human beings to bore one another seems to be vastly greater than that of any other animal." H. L. Mencken
Last edited:
