Quote from TMcKenna:
Daal,
You don't think XLF bottomed at $5.88?
I dont think so(better to put this way I think there is downside on XLF at the *present* levels), mainly because the 'buffett' plan is not likely to be used.
His plan would call for the government to guarantee banks liabilities(preventing runs) and then let the banks play accounting games for years while they 'buildup' capital through their pre-tax income(US banking pre-tax income is around $300b compared to Roubini estimate of losses of $1.8T against $1.4T of US banking capital, so it would take a few years but it would happen, the pre-tax income would grow as margins for lending now are higher as well)
Now it seems that we are having a solvency crisis but the big issue is liquidity, runs etc. The banks can stay insolvent for years and
it wouldn't matter if nobody asked for their money back(like it happened in Japan), they would build capital back. In the present situation there is no trust and there are a lot of wholesale funding so there is panic and runs(BSC, LEH, WM, WB) as a long people dont trust the bankers and the government doesnt guarantee liabilities, the government will be forced to dillute bank shareholders in order to get capital ratios up and calm people down.
Now there IS a risk Geithner changes his plans and does the buffett plan(perhaps starting by decreasing bank capital ratio requirements then guaranteeing liabilities) this would generate a short-squeeze of biblical proportions however this is a zombie like approach and that seem to be detested by policymarkers
Under the current policies more dillution is coming down the road, its just that its important to monitor Geithner and Bernanke to see if they change their minds