I am surprised (and disappointed) that they did not dilute by a greater amount.
However I agree that a lot of things have been taken away from common and (junior) preferred stockholders:
* voting rights
* dividends
* priority if GSEs fail (i.e., preferred stock is junior to the new senior preferred)
Also:
* Likely removal from S&P 500 (I would be surprised if they are still in the index after the end of September)
* Lost amongst the news of the bailout is the detail in the New York Times about dubious accounting at FRE. They failed to report some losses, instead waiting to report them later this year or in early 2009.
In the premarket it looks like the stocks will open at 1.50 to 1.70. To me I think FRE should be "valued" lower than FNM. So maybe there is potential here to short FRE / long FNM for a pair trade, if an outright short in FRE is considered too risky.
However I agree that a lot of things have been taken away from common and (junior) preferred stockholders:
* voting rights
* dividends
* priority if GSEs fail (i.e., preferred stock is junior to the new senior preferred)
Also:
* Likely removal from S&P 500 (I would be surprised if they are still in the index after the end of September)
* Lost amongst the news of the bailout is the detail in the New York Times about dubious accounting at FRE. They failed to report some losses, instead waiting to report them later this year or in early 2009.
In the premarket it looks like the stocks will open at 1.50 to 1.70. To me I think FRE should be "valued" lower than FNM. So maybe there is potential here to short FRE / long FNM for a pair trade, if an outright short in FRE is considered too risky.
Quote from Daal:
The fnm fre market got it what it deserved. They behaved like a drunk smiling morons in the face of total armageddon
If you think about the things that gives value of common shares(claims of profits like dividends, indirect dividends like stock buybacks, potential profitable merger of takeover) they were all removed in a single move.
I'm actually quite surprised the warrants are only for a 80% stake, some are saying they did this in order to get the management to cooperate
Worse than those factors is the agreement that the gses are not shareholder oriented anymore, this means low return on equity lower leverage IF they return to profitability one day, this largely removes the 'hope factor'.
PLUS the preferred stock suffered a 'event of default' in 5 years they will be able to reclaim some of the unpaid dividends through warrants, this will dillute the shares even more.
So if fnm and fre only open down like 50-60% I think I will add some more.
Also a 'lawsuit short squeeze' could occur, bill miller will claim paulson and co said they had enough capital, I dont think the saga is totally over
Too bad I will lose some money in WB and WM today but I own a canadian lender(QCC in the nyse, but I own the canandian shares) so on the net this will be a big day because I concentrated my position trades in the gses
If caught the move congratulate yourself! This was my best trade of the year and I think I ought to reward myself for all the +20% days