I agree that the shares will probably not have a 50% to 100% type rebound until the Treasury says something. (Alternatively if they fall below $1.50 or so then a 50% plus rebound becomes more likely).
However they both rallied about 40% from Wednesday morning to Thursday morning on an intraday basis.
Regarding which stock to short, my preference is FRE. In the unlikely situation that there is no Treasury bailout / equity injection, FRE still needs to raise $5.5 billion.
I doubt that 5.5 billion capital raising can happen without Government intervention.
However they both rallied about 40% from Wednesday morning to Thursday morning on an intraday basis.
Regarding which stock to short, my preference is FRE. In the unlikely situation that there is no Treasury bailout / equity injection, FRE still needs to raise $5.5 billion.
I doubt that 5.5 billion capital raising can happen without Government intervention.
Quote from Daal:
XLF went up almost 4% on friday and year WB and WM went DOWN, usually on buy financials day's these stocks soared 5-10%, the market seem to be waking to the payoption arm
I'm sort of throwing the towel here on a big rebound of fnm and fre. The market seem uncertain about the value of their shares, that uncertain wont go away untill the Treasury says something, the treasury cant give a positive note because now a private offering is almost impossible(and paulson worked in the underwriting business so he ought to know) so the shares will stay depressed. back when fnm and fre did their massive surge the market didnt know what would happen so they let their bias lead them to buy first and ask later, plus you had all the shorts trying to get out.
I think we will get a few intraday rallies(maybe as high as 30%) there but I dont see a 100% move anytime soon, my adds now are on FNM because I believe its more overvalued(now when the perma rebounder throws the towel like that you know its the bottom). I've added about bit on friday, I'm still avoiding taking a big position because of the uncertainty