The COVID Response Losers: Countries With Failed Leadership

Why is Ivermectin being poo-poo'd? Well for one possible reason... if there is even one other effective medicine/protocol which is effective against the Covid, the current jabs can't get EUA status. (There are other political and financial reasons.)

Explains a lot!

https://www.cnsnews.com/article/nat...ermectin-covid-wonder-drug-if-you-take-it-you

:(

Update... I just ran across this... "NIH approves Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid"... story dated January 23, 2021. So why is it not being used extensively... some of those "political agenda" and financial reasons??

nih-approves-ivermectin-for-covid-treatment-png.267134


https://www.theburningplatform.com/...-use-in-the-us-for-the-treatment-of-covid-19/

Begs another question... If Ivermectin is approved for Covid treatment, how then are all vaccines except Pfizer still being allowed to be used?* Only Pfizer has FDA approval (phony as a $3 bill, of course), but the others should not be available at all if the law were being followed. :(

Inquiring minds want to know.

*My subconscious chewed on this a bit... I think it's sort of a technicality. While the NIH has approved Ivermectin for use in treating Covid, the FDA has not. Must ask, "why not"? Shouldn't bother to ask, you wouldn't like the answer.) I think the law about EUA is that there be "no other FDA approved drug/protocol available".
zzzzh.jpg
 
it's also what happens when you have almost everyone vaccinated as data from many states and countries can attest to.
It’s amazing this idiot GWB doesn’t even know what’s happening in the most stabbed countries. Cognitive dissonance
 
You mean the states that actually test for Covid infections find more infections. Shocking.

But I thought you implied that high vaccination rates led to low case data. Why would it matter if we test for infections and find more infections if most of the folks are by and large, vaccinated?

You said this is what happened when "no one was vaccinated", right?
 
But I thought you implied that high vaccination rates led to low case data. Why would it matter if we test for infections and find more infections if most of the folks are by and large, vaccinated?

You said this is what happened when "no one was vaccinated", right?

Oh, do tell us about the current Covid hospitalization and death rates in these states.
 
Oh, do tell us about the current Covid hospitalization and death rates in these states.

Again, that's not what you said. Don't try to redirect. You didn't say anything about hospitalization and death rates. You said that "this is what happens (in regards to NK) when you have no one vaccinated"

I then replied that it is also what happens when you have high vaccination rates, and showed evidence.

If you don't like being called out on it, don't make dumb ass statements all the time.
 
Again, that's not what you said. Don't try to redirect. You didn't say anything about hospitalization and death rates. You said that "this is what happens (in regards to NK) when you have no one vaccinated"

I then replied that it is also what happens when you have high vaccination rates, and showed evidence.

If you don't like being called out on it, don't make dumb ass statements all the time.

So you are saying Covid vaccination does very well in protecting against serious illness and death. Got it.
 
Back
Top