The Coronavirus Is Here Forever

[Turveyd]

Once again:


Once again:

So Once again, your going to ignore everything not bother to do your own research and play silly games with words, got it!!

Until we've went communist then there won't be any proof that it's happening until it's happened, so after proof many years while in a possible transition phase is errrrrrr illogical.

Quite a lot of people all over the world think, it's facism and communism on the rise.

But either way, why did I bother wasting time on you, BLOCKING Later, your insane, likely WRB again!!

#UNT!!!!

 

[Turveyd]

"In a newly released Peer-Reviewed article appearing in the journal "Vaccine" researchers performed an extensive survey of the database of the European Medicines Agency and the Dutch National Register, two of the most accurate recording agencies. Base on a carefully conducted analysis they concluded that in order for vaccination to prevent three deaths, two healthy people would have to die because of the vaccines."

And 40K jabbed to save 1 life, from memory, the three deaths are average age 82 where as the 2 health people could be 12year olds, this proves the 100% safe is a lie massively. This is short term, no idea on the long term side effects, but the lack of being able to discuss it even openly and all the blocked scientists trying to get it banned getting censored and sacked means to me, that there hiding something, I personally think this is a depopulation and sterilization event.

With Treatments the WHO blocke and are trying again, 99.97% recovery rate, with average death age being around 83.



Nice post

 

[userque]

So Once again, your going to ignore everything not bother to do your own research and play silly games with words, got it!!

For the last time,
I haven't seen google search items supporting your position. I didn't ignore anything--I looked, and found nothing. I can't dumb it down any further for you.

Until we've went communist then there won't be any proof that it's happening until it's happened, so after proof many years while in a possible transition phase is errrrrrr illogical.

Quite a lot of people all over the world think, it's facism and communism on the rise.

But either way, why did I bother wasting time on you, BLOCKING Later, your insane, likely WRB again!!

#UNT!!!!

For the last time,
It's up to you to support your claims.

While you've been hammering away at the keyboard, you've yet to cite a source supporting your claim.

 

[Turveyd]

Once again:


Once again:

Since when did people have to backup there opinion, an opinion is an opinion, did I miss something, no longer allowed an opinion in 2021??

Enjoy your descent into communism, not that you'll notice, because then you'd have an opinion and ohhhhh no, there banned.

It's my OPINION that the world is going New World Order, communist and facist and totalitarian police state, END OF DISCUSSION!!

Would you like to provide me PROOF that it won't be by 2030?? Have you not got a time machine, just because it's not a real thing, doesn't mean that you shouldn't have it, make the effort.


Defo WRB TROLLING!!!

 

[userque]

Since when did people have to backup there opinion, an opinion is an opinion, did I miss something, no longer allowed an opinion in 2021??

Oh, since you can't support your contentions, now it was always just an opinion? You're a terrible bullshitter, btw.

Next time, instead of presenting your opinions as facts, and telling others that the evidence can be easily googled, and telling others they are intentionally ignoring all that google evidence:
just use the abbreviation, "IMO," or something to that effect.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Oh, since you can't support your contentions, now it was always just an opinion? You're a terrible bullshitter, btw.

Next time, instead of presenting your opinions as facts, and telling others that the evidence can be easily googled, and telling others they are intentionally ignoring all that google evidence:
just use the abbreviation, "IMO," or something to that effect.

 

[userque]

View attachment 266932

Evidence?

 

[easymon1]

It was a TV news item and I can't find it. You are right there have been many articles saying it increases blood clots, which seems to be the case.

morganist, could you please post a link to where I said what you claim above?
Don't think I did, sir.

 

[morganist]

morganist, could you please post a link to where I said what you claim above?
Don't think I did, sir.

True I can't find it, but there was a TV news report that stated blood clots were lowered in people who had the jab. I think the virus in itself gives people blood clots in fingers and toes, this is supposed to be reduced after the jabs.

 

[virtusa]

morganist, could you please post a link to where I said what you claim above?
Don't think I did, sir.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...u2DLdJ2cvlreXf3wNMgJ7SXvy4DtT0vwEiaMTsJ8tGmow
Analysis of 29m people finds danger of infection with Sars-Cov-2 far outweighs the risks of having jab

However, the data showed that there would be 934 extra cases of thrombocytopenia for every 10 million people after infection, compared with 107 after the first shot of the AstraZeneca jab. For ischaemic strokes, there would be an estimated 1,699 extra cases for every 10 million people after infection, while there would be only 143 extra cases after the first Pfizer jab.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/me...id-infection-than-with-the-vaccine/ar-AANOAPB