Presuming your english not great, where you from?
He's only threatening to quit the site as he's a payed sponsor of the site, calm if I'm not banned.
Last edited:
Hey Ken...
Lets put that IQ to work. And consider the trade... consider the magnitude of the risk and the outcomes.
Facts to consider:
Data:
95% of people in ICU had co morbidity (per CDC study posted this week...here)
Age is a massive factor in ICU and death per ever study but it was not counted as
a risk factor above... so skew those results to the very old.
Far more people have been infected and exposed than the % positives we saw.
For instance 66% of India tested positive for Covid antibodies and since not everyone tests positive for antibodies... we may conclude almost everyone in India out and about was exposed.
I would bet the same holds true for the U.S. but more were vaccinated.
From the limited data released we have seen 3x to 5x as many people were exposed to the original waves.
---
Immune System Mitigation of Risk
96 percent in ICU had vitamin D deficiency per CDC study shared here in the past.
Recent studies show sufficient D may prevent infection and severe symptoms.
Natural immunity 13 fold better than vaccine immunity and 7 fold better at
protecting from Severe Covid... pre this weeks study.
Consistent exercise also may help prevent symptoms.
Really anything that would prevent your immune system from going into a Cytokine storm
is probably going to be very beneficial at reducing your risk of Covid problems.
Societal Risks
1. People with vaccination can still spread virus.
2. High risk vaccinated may be fertile breeding grounds for more deadly virus.
3. High unvaccinated may also be... but it would be based on laws of nature.
4. Spread Happens mostly in not entirely from the symptomatic... if you look at the studies
the ones claiming otherwise are guesses by experts or models... if they really had proof
there would be contact tracing proof. (this could have changed during Delta... but I never saw the headlines...saying so.)
5. Cloth masks and Surgical mask only work at 12% efficiency or less... while clean. Masks did not protect spread... because few work useful masks properly. maybe in in a few thousand had a properly fitted clean n95.
Individual assessments...
And let's say your last cold was 20 years ago, and you work out everyday. You go to beach lot and started water sports again.
And family members already had covid.... and you knew from talking to ER docs in the middle of it... that they knew that it took about 15 minutes exposure to a very symptomatic person during the first wave to get sick. (in general) so you did very little to protect yourself almost happy to be hit with low doses for short periods of time.
You really going to risk all that for a temporary spike in your antibodies...which may hook you into needing boosters for life and the potential for a screw up causing ADE?
What is your conclusion... you think I shoud risk all the potential downsides for what I deem very slight almost zero risk of ICU?
My Conclusion...
I respect your decision making...for you...especially if you may have a compromised immune system...but I know the high risk vaccinated are potentially a bigger risk during a pandemic than the low risk.
But, Please keep your moral judgements suspended until we have a few years worth of data.
When it comes to public health and safety I want to do the right thing. I can't in good conscience remain a sponsor of any place where dangerous covid deniers are welcome to post potentially harmful misinformation.
I am certain other sponsors feel the same. Is an exodus pending.
See terms of service updates at all major social media sites.
Baron, and all, read:
https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/covid-19
https://about.fb.com/news/2020/12/coronavirus/
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785?hl=en
COVID-19 medical misinformation policy
https://feeds.aarp.org/health/condi...cks-coronavirus-misinformation.html?_amp=true
There's a reason that Twitter, Facebook and YouTube have content restrictions around user-generated covid content and misinformation.
It's called liability protection. And common sense. Do you disagree with them, too?
Please read carefully, they explain it
read:
https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/covid-19
https://about.fb.com/news/2020/12/coronavirus/
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785?hl=en
COVID-19 medical misinformation policy
https://feeds.aarp.org/health/condi...cks-coronavirus-misinformation.html?_amp=true
There's a reason that Twitter, Facebook and YouTube have content restrictions around user-generated covid content and misinformation.
It's called liability protection. And common sense. Do you disagree with them, too?
Please read carefully, they explain it
read:
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785?hl=en
Then read it again
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785?hl=en
COVID-19 medical misinformation policy
https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/covid-19
https://about.fb.com/news/2020/12/coronavirus/
https://feeds.aarp.org/health/condi...cks-coronavirus-misinformation.html?_amp=true
There's a reason that Twitter, Facebook and YouTube have content restrictions around user-generated covid content and misinformation.
It's called liability protection. And common sense. Do you disagree with them, too?
Please read carefully, they explain it
read:
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785?hl=en
Then read it again
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785?hl=en
COVID-19 medical misinformation policy
https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/covid-19
https://about.fb.com/news/2020/12/coronavirus/
https://feeds.aarp.org/health/condi...cks-coronavirus-misinformation.html?_amp=true
morganist, could you post the specific data and a link to this news item? Thanks.I just saw a news item that said the chances of blood blots are much less if you have the injections