First off, I did not agree that Clinton should have been impeached. He committed crimes but they were Low Crimes. As far as Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congreff, these are not impeachable and one of them, Obstruction of Congreff is a non-crime unless court ordered.--and of course Abuse of Power never occurred.
The Conservative Principle
- Thread starter Buy1Sell2
- Start date
My home state had two republicans in the Senate. Both voted against impeaching Clinton.
Not sure we will see much independent thinking by Senators these days.
Maybe Joe Manchin who is a semi-republican democrat.
This could be his chance to finally change parties. ----I did not support impeachment in any way shape or form with Clinton. Impeachment is reserved for real offenses of a serious nature against the country.
Another thing to consider, and is of major concern, is that The President is being impeached by California and New York.---Nanner Pelosi (CA), Adam BullSchiff (CA), Eric Shartwell (CA), Jerry Nonads (NY), Eliott Engel (NY), Maxine Waters (CA) and ,behind the scenes for now, Chuck U Schumer (NY).----
This is another great argument for The Electoral College and the fact that each state gets 2 senators regardless of how large or small the states are.
Thank goodness that New York and California will only get 4 votes total at the trial should it occur.
This is another great argument for The Electoral College and the fact that each state gets 2 senators regardless of how large or small the states are.
Thank goodness that New York and California will only get 4 votes total at the trial should it occur.
Last edited:
--and the defenders of The President are Jim Jordan (OH), Matt Gaetz (FL), Devin Nunes (CA), Lindsey Graham (SC), Mitch McConnell (KY), Ted Cruz (TX), John Ratcliffe (TX), Doug Collins (GA), John Kennedy (LA), Steve Scalise (IA), Andy Biggs (AZ), Mark Meadows (NC), Kevin McCarthy (CA).---
Anyone see a difference between the two groups? One group attacking The President and the other group defending him? ----I do---.
Anyone see a difference between the two groups? One group attacking The President and the other group defending him? ----I do---.
what a scholar, what a political analyst. thanks so much for stating the obvious dipshit, so there are 2 groups: one attacking him and one defending. wow!!
no source huh? Seems legit
For a second there, it almost sounded like B12S was posting a statistical randomized sampling with some meaning, rather than a collection of odds with literal bias.