Quote from clacy:
One thing is for certain..... the politicians WILL not reduce spending, until there is no alternative. The "people" want their government cheese, even though they claim they want spending reduced and taxes to not go up.
1. The executive branch and half the Senate will not reduce spending, you are right. It wants to do the opposite. And FAST ! ..... Get your decoder ring: more 'revenues" (how deep are your pockets ?) and more "investments" into the 26th best education in the world and into picking winners in the private sector. All done efficently, mind you. "Shovel ready jobs" was already used, and it knows it can't go with that one again.
2. At least half the people do "want their government cheese" which is why point #1 is the way it is."
3. To "claim they [including suckers of government tits included in point 2] want spending reduced and taxes to not go up" need clarification.
A. Half are ok for continued spending and for taxes to go up on themselves within reason, because the country has moved that far left due to promises from demogogues, liers, and hippy generation professors that have them sold on the nanny state. (Now tell me again why Europe's banks are undercapitalized and it has PIIGS countries.)
B. Of the next half, half of them want spending to be reduced as long as they themselves are not affected; and as long as taxes go up on the "rich" [capitalists, job creators, etc.] that already pay most of taxes and not for themselves to have to pay.
C. This #3 point is cause for point #1 also.
I am concerned about--and the use of a label--"confiscation schemes." But it is manifestly evident in the last 4 years with respect to our money, (1) there is acceleration of government invasion of privacy, e.g., overseas banks forced to report U.S. citizens' deposits, (2) erosion of our personal independence and wealth with what it takes from and returns to us, (3) its insane "printing" of money that is/will drags the strength of the dollar, (4) and implementation of currency controls with respect to erecting impedence of how much and where we can take our money. It's an accelerating slippery slope, not unlike bites to the ankle always nipping at quality of life the last 15 years and into the near and intermediate future. At some point this frog slowing its swim in the continually heating water won't be able to jump from the pot just before it heats to a boil should we remain on this presently projected path.
Then there is the demographics not enough attention is directed to that all by itself is potentially implosive- causing, but that is a different subject. I'm going surfing (link in second post...labeled "surfer boy with trader").
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3712161#post3712161