If there is truth and context in those claims, then I'm sure it will all get the proper sunlight it deserves when she becomes the Democratic nominee.
Can you explain to me why the Clinton Foundation should be considered a charity and not a PAC.
Can you name one example of charitable use of the Clinton Foundation's money besides re-distributing it to other politically connected foundations and individuals?
The Gates Foundation and other similar initiatives led by wealthy individuals can provide clear examples of their charity spending and it's direct impact across the world.