The Clinton Chronicles

Stein hits Clinton on emails: Voters "owed an explanation"

By David Wright

(CNN)Green Party candidate Jill Stein attacked Hillary Clinton on Monday for her use of a private email server as Secretary of State, amid reports that notes from Clinton's interview with the FBI during its probe of the matter would be turned over soon to Congress.

Declining to say whether she thought Clinton should have faced criminal charges from the FBI after its probe, Stein said that the issue "raises real questions about her competency."
"I think there should have been a full investigation. I think the American people are owed an explanation for what happened, and why top secret information was put at risk, why the identity of secret agents were potentially put at risk," Stein told CNN's Carol Costello.
Asked if she thought Clinton should have faced criminal charges based on the FBI's investigation, Stein would only say that "that's a matter that deserves public discussion."

Stein will have the opportunity to continue to make her case against Clinton and the other presidential candidates at a CNN-hosted Green Party Town Hall event on Wednesday at 9:00 p.m.

The Green Party presidential hopeful also said she agreed with calls for another investigation of Clinton's email server use, this time by an oversight committee from the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

"We're talking about state secrets and these are the highest level of state secrets that were put at risk, when it is known that the protections for her e-mail were extremely inadequate," Stein said. "In fact, orders were being issued from her office to others in the Secretary of State Department to do the exact opposite of what she was doing. So certainly, you know, if she wasn't aware that she was violating State Department rules, it raises real issues about her competency."

The Clinton campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Stein's remarks.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/15/politics/stein-hits-clinton-on-emails/index.html
 
The Clinton Campaign Made a Suspicious Edit to its Website's Sexual Assault Page
1aaac5ee4672fe68ad36c4da292d3db54fb66c2a_m.jpg

Juanita Broaddrick took Hillary Clinton to task earlier this year after the Democratic nominee insisted rape survivors have the right to be believed. On the campaign trail in November, the then-presidential candidate told an audience that “every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.” Broaddrick, who claims to have been raped by former president Bill Clinton in the 1970s, challenged his wife to back up her claims by allowing her to tell her story.

The frustrated tweet she posted in response to Clinton's statement has now been retweeted almost 46,000 times.

Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut
I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73....it never goes away.

11:42 AM - 6 Jan 2016

Before Broaddrick tweeted this message, Clinton's campaign website had a sexual assault page which read victims have "a right to be heard." Following Broaddrick's post, that language mysteriously disappeared. A Reddit user noticed the suspicious edit.

A redditor also pointed out that Hillary Clinton’s campaign website appeared to have made some edits to its “campus sexual assault” page. Last winter, website archives show, a September 14, 2015, quote from Hillary ran across the top:

“I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault: Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed, and we’re with you.”

In February, shortly after Broaddrick’s viral tweet made headlines, the line “you have the right to be believed” was cut from the text. A video of the full remarks, that line included, is currently on the page. The Clinton campaign declined to comment on the change.

The timeline is just too telling.

Clinton, who often champions herself as a women's rights hero, is apparently okay with her campaign pretending Broaddrick doesn't exist.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...dit-its-websites-sexual-assault-page-n2205190
 
A Candidate You Can Trust (to Lie)

By Windsor Mann
August 16, 2016

Hillary Clinton’s greatest strength—her experience—is also her greatest weakness. Having spent the last four decades in politics, she has prodigious experience in the worst profession that isn’t outlawed—that of lying to people for the purpose of ruling them.

“Public service,” she calls it.

First as an attorney and then as a politician, Clinton has been lying professionally since the disco era. Even before her first election to the Senate, the late William Safire called her “a congenital liar” and “a habitual prevaricator.” These designations can now be scientifically verified.

Recently, Clinton maintained that FBI Director James Comey found her statements regarding her email server to be “truthful”—a claim that The Washington Post’s fact-checker Glenn Kessler gave “Four Pinocchios,” enough to make it a “whopper.”

More astounding: Asked in February if she has ever lied, Clinton said, “I don’t believe I ever have. I don’t believe I ever will.”

It’s possible she really believes this. After all, this is the same woman who once said, “My husband may have his faults, but he has never lied to me.” This is the same husband who, after cheating on his wife with Monica Lewinsky, proclaimed on national television, “I misled people, including even my wife.” Misled her, yes, but never lied to her.

Like her husband, Clinton doesn’t lie. Rather, she “misspeaks.” On several occasions she claimed that as the first lady she encountered sniper fire in Bosnia. When this turned out to be false, Clinton backtracked, saying she “misspoke.”

She has a knack for public misspeaking. When she announced that she and her husband were “dead broke” in 2001, she actually meant “alive and filthy rich.” Her bad.

Clinton is a poor liar because she’s an obvious one. She’s like a bald man with a comb-over. Covering up the obvious only makes the obvious more conspicuous.

To be fair, Clinton doesn’t always lie. In 1999, she wrote in a newspaper column that her husband became president “six years ago”—i.e., in 1993. That was totally accurate.

Most of the time, she evades the truth, even when it’s obvious. In her 656-page book “Hard Choices,” the only interesting sentence concerns the “question” of whether she would run for president in 2016. “I haven’t decided yet,” she wrote. As Frank Rich put it, “no one in her right mind would write a fat book this dull, this unrevealing, and this innocuous unless she were running for president.”

Running for president and telling the truth are mutually exclusive. “Whenever a man has cast a longing eye on offices,” Thomas Jefferson observed, “a rottenness begins in his conduct.” Clinton, who is not a man, has been eyeing the presidency since the 1990s and calibrating her positions accordingly.

Thanks to her efforts, she has her party’s nomination and her country’s distrust. According to a recent CNN poll, 66 percent of voters find her dishonest and untrustworthy. About as many people find her trustworthy as find Bigfoot plausible.

Clinton knows she has trust issues. “You can’t just talk someone into trusting you,” she said in June. “You’ve got to earn it.”

The way to earn people’s trust is by proving yourself trustworthy. That takes time, which Clinton doesn’t have.

What should she do? Simple: Clinton should be honest about her dishonesty.

Here’s what she should say:

“People accuse me of dishonesty, and the people, God bless them (and America), are right. That’s my job as a politician. I represent the voters, and the only way to do that is by pretending to share their values.

“Some call this lying. I call it evolution by natural selection. If I don’t adapt to the latest Gallup data, I die politically, which is worse than being assassinated by one of Donald Trump’s goons.

“Yes, I lie. But I lie for the right reasons—for the public good and for my own. I was against gay marriage when everybody hated it. Now that it’s popular, I’m for it. As long as the voters keep changing their minds, so will I. As president, I will speak their minds and misspeak my own.”

Vote for Hillary. She’s a liar you can trust.

Windsor Mann is the editor of “The Quotable Hitchens: From Alcohol to Zionism.”
 
Hillary Clinton is a despicable human being. human being.

After Juanita Broaddrick’s Biting Tweet, Clinton Campaign Mysteriously Changes Position on Sexual Assault

by Chris White | 11:04 am, August 16th, 2016

A lengthy interview with Juanita Broaddrick was published on Sunday on Buzzfeed. Broaddrick first came forward in the late 1990s and accused Bill Clinton of raping her in an Arkansas motel room in 1978 when he was governor of Arkansas. She has also said that she believes Hillary Clinton attempted to pressure her to stay silent about the incident. The full interview covers all of this and more. It is a very enlightening interview and well worth the short amount of time it takes to read.

So far, the vast majority of the media coverage surrounding the interview has focused on a single paragraph of the interview. Specifically, the part where Broaddrick was critical of the Trump campaign’s decision to use audio from a 1999 Dateline NBC interview in which she tearfully recounted the alleged rape incident. In theBuzzfeed interview, Broaddrick said she “thought it was tasteless” for the Trump campaign to use that portion of the interview, especially without notifying her ahead of time.

Focusing on that portion of the interview appears to have allowed media outlets to claim they covered the story, albeit without mentioning any parts of the article that are damaging to the Clinton campaign.

For example, Broaddrick explains in the interview that she decided to come forward again last fall after a series of tweets by Hillary Clinton saying sexual assault victims have a right to be heard. Broaddrick told the interviewer she went “ballistic” upon seeing these tweets:

Hillary Clinton

✔@HillaryClinton
"To every survivor of sexual assault...You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed. We're with you." —Hillary

Hillary Clinton

✔@HillaryClinton
Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported. http://hrc.io/SexualAssault

5:09 PM - 22 Nov 2015

Hillary on ending campus sexual assault
It's not enough to condemn campus sexual assault. We need to end it.

hillaryclinton.com


In January, Broaddrick responded with a tweet of her own that quickly went viral.

Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut
I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73....it never goes away.

As the Legal Insurrection blog first pointed out, this is where theBuzzfeed article gets very interesting. After Broaddrick’s tweet went viral, the Clinton campaign appears to have quietly removed some of the candidate’s statements about sexual assault victims from its website.

The Buzzfeed article first points to web archives from September 2015 that show the “campus sexual assault” portion of the website included this quote from Clinton:

“I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault: Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed’, and we’re with you.”

However, sometime in February (after Broaddrick’s tweet went viral), the campaign reportedly removed the line “you have the right to be believed” from its webpage. Although, a video that includes that line is still posted on the website.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/did...ampaign-to-change-position-on-sexual-assault/
 
STATE DEPARTMENT
State Department sought land deal with Nigerian firm tied to Clinton Foundation

By James Rosen

Published August 17, 2016

Clinton Foundation dogged by more allegations of impropriety

EXCLUSIVE: Shortly after Hillary Clinton left the Obama administration, the State Department quietly took steps to purchase real estate in Nigeria from a firm whose parent company is owned by a major donor to the Clinton Foundation, records obtained by Fox News show.

On March 20, 2013, William P. Franklin, an “international realty specialist” at the State Department, emailed Mary E. Davis, an American diplomat stationed in Africa, instructing her to “put on Post letterhead” an “expression of interest” by the department in purchasing property at Eko Atlantic, a massive real estate development off the coast of Lagos. Franklin further instructed that the signed letter was to be “delivered to Ronald Chagoury.”

The draft letter, also obtained by Fox News, was undated and addressed to Chagoury care of his firm South Energyx Nigeria Limited, a subsidiary of the larger Chagoury Group that is spearheading the Eko Atlantic real estate venture. The State Department letter sought, among other things, to confirm that the department could proceed with “acquisition of the real property…[at] the asking price of $1,250 per square meter.”

Overtures to real estate developers from State Department officials scouting locations for embassies, consulates and other diplomatic facilities would ordinarily not arouse interest. But in this case, the budding transaction – never completed, the department now says – raised eyebrows because Ronald Chagoury is the brother and business partner, in the Chagoury Group, of Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese-born businessman whom federal records show has donated between $1 and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Indeed, Gilbert Chagoury’s friendship with the Clintons can be traced back to the Clinton presidency. In the mid-1990s, Chagoury donated nearly $500,000 to a voter-registration drive designed to help Democratic candidates, attended a White House dinner for premium donors, and met with high-ranking officials in the Clinton White House – including Susan Rice, now President Obama’s national security adviser – who were shaping U.S. policy toward Nigeria.

More recently, the Chagourys’ close ties to the Clintons generatedheadlines when a separate series of emails from 2009 – between Doug Band, an aide to former President Clinton and Huma Abedin, an aide to Secretary Clinton – revealed the eagerness of the State Department to oblige a request for Chagoury to be granted access to senior officials working on Lebanon.

The State Department’s outreach to the Chagoury family, looking to buy property from the brothers, came less than a month after former President Clinton himself toured the Eko Atlantic project – for the second time. The first occasion was the ground breaking, in 2009, in which the former president participated. By all accounts, Eko Atlantic represents a staggeringly ambitious undertaking: the dredging of millions of tons of sand from the sea floor off Victoria Island and the creation of an estimated 3.5 square miles of new land, on which the Chagourys aim to establish what they call a “21st century city … for residential, commercial, financial and tourist development.”

Mr. Clinton toured the Eko Atlantic site for the second time on February 21, 2013 – twenty days after his wife left the State Department – to celebrate the Chagourys’ reclamation of 5 million square meters of land, a critical juncture in the project.

Smiling and animated, Mr. Clinton was photographed conferring with Gilbert Chagoury and Jeffrey J. Hawkins, the consul general for the State Department in Nigeria. Twenty-seven days later, when William P. Franklin would order aides to begin exploring the acquisition of land from South Energyx, the Chagoury-owned company, Hawkins would be one of four State Department officials copied on Franklin’s email.

“A month after Bill Clinton visits a Gilbert and Ronald Chagoury-run land project in Nigeria, the U.S. State Department wants to buy the same land,” said David N. Bossie, president of Citizens United, the conservative advocacy group whose litigation against the State Department pried loose the Franklin email and accompanying letter. “Who could be so lucky? A major donor to the Clinton Foundation, that’s who.”

Queried by Fox News about the matter, the State Department said its officials had “prioritized” the search for a new consulate location in Lagos back in 2011 – when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state – and that an “independent international real estate firm” had identified Eko Atlantic as a potential site the following year.

“Our site search process … is managed by career real estate professionals in the Bureau of Overseas Building Operations, with input from independent real estate firms and other department stakeholders,” said Elizabeth Trudeau, a State Department spokeswoman, at a briefing for reporters on Monday. “The department has had conversations with multiple property owners and their representatives about the possibility of acquiring property for a new consulate in Lagos.”

Trudeau could not explain why a “prioritized” mission had dragged on for five years without success, noting only that “acquiring property that’s appropriate” for a diplomatic facility can be “a long process.” Asked if Secretary Clinton had been aware of her department’s identification of the Chagoury-owned land as a potential site for a consulate, Trudeau replied: “I’m not aware she was.”

The Clinton campaign did not respond to a request for comment. Mark Corallo, a Washington-based spokesman for Gilbert Chagoury, said in a statement that given the project’s “state-of-the-art urban design,” including advanced telecommunications and security features, “it should come as no surprise that the United States government and other governments from around the world are considering Eko Atlantic as a new opportunity for locating their offices that operate in Lagos.”

John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and Fox News contributor, said the entire series of events involving the Clintons and the Chagourys appeared, at a minimum, poorly handled to insulate Secretary Clinton from conflict of interest charges.

“The impression left is that there’s favoritism involved,” Bolton said. “And it’s just very unusual in State Department real estate and housing transactions overseas to have this kind of focus on someone with such clear financial connections to even the departed secretary of state. Normally, there’s much more competitive activity involved, [of] which we haven’t seen any evidence from the State Department.”

Experts agreed the March 2013 email from William P. Franklin to Mary E. Davis, triggering the State Department’s letter to Ronald Chagoury for a possible real estate transaction, would likely have formed only one set of documents in a longer trail that would have dated back to 2012 – the year the State Department said Eko Atlantic had been identified as a potential site for a new consulate.

Such a trail would presumably include internal correspondence addressing the suitability of the Eko Atlantic site and, perhaps, flagging the potential conflict of interest that could be cited, given the longstanding ties between the Clintons and the Chagourys.

But Citizens United said no other documents on the consulate-scouting effort were turned over by the State Department. The group filed its initial Freedom of Information Act request with the State Department for records relating to Gilbert Chagoury back in 2014, and, receiving no reply, filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in April 2015.



 
Optionpro007 said:
STATE DEPARTMENT
State Department sought land deal with Nigerian firm tied to Clinton Foundation

By James Rosen

Published August 17, 2016

Clinton Foundation dogged by more allegations of impropriety

EXCLUSIVE: Shortly after Hillary Clinton left the Obama administration, the State Department quietly took steps to purchase real estate in Nigeria from a firm whose parent company is owned by a major donor to the Clinton Foundation, records obtained by Fox News show.

On March 20, 2013, William P. Franklin, an “international realty specialist” at the State Department, emailed Mary E. Davis, an American diplomat stationed in Africa, instructing her to “put on Post letterhead” an “expression of interest” by the department in purchasing property at Eko Atlantic, a massive real estate development off the coast of Lagos. Franklin further instructed that the signed letter was to be “delivered to Ronald Chagoury.”

The draft letter, also obtained by Fox News, was undated and addressed to Chagoury care of his firm South Energyx Nigeria Limited, a subsidiary of the larger Chagoury Group that is spearheading the Eko Atlantic real estate venture. The State Department letter sought, among other things, to confirm that the department could proceed with “acquisition of the real property…[at] the asking price of $1,250 per square meter.”

Overtures to real estate developers from State Department officials scouting locations for embassies, consulates and other diplomatic facilities would ordinarily not arouse interest. But in this case, the budding transaction – never completed, the department now says – raised eyebrows because Ronald Chagoury is the brother and business partner, in the Chagoury Group, of Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese-born businessman whom federal records show has donated between $1 and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Indeed, Gilbert Chagoury’s friendship with the Clintons can be traced back to the Clinton presidency. In the mid-1990s, Chagoury donated nearly $500,000 to a voter-registration drive designed to help Democratic candidates, attended a White House dinner for premium donors, and met with high-ranking officials in the Clinton White House – including Susan Rice, now President Obama’s national security adviser – who were shaping U.S. policy toward Nigeria.

More recently, the Chagourys’ close ties to the Clintons generatedheadlines when a separate series of emails from 2009 – between Doug Band, an aide to former President Clinton and Huma Abedin, an aide to Secretary Clinton – revealed the eagerness of the State Department to oblige a request for Chagoury to be granted access to senior officials working on Lebanon.

The State Department’s outreach to the Chagoury family, looking to buy property from the brothers, came less than a month after former President Clinton himself toured the Eko Atlantic project – for the second time. The first occasion was the ground breaking, in 2009, in which the former president participated. By all accounts, Eko Atlantic represents a staggeringly ambitious undertaking: the dredging of millions of tons of sand from the sea floor off Victoria Island and the creation of an estimated 3.5 square miles of new land, on which the Chagourys aim to establish what they call a “21st century city … for residential, commercial, financial and tourist development.”

Mr. Clinton toured the Eko Atlantic site for the second time on February 21, 2013 – twenty days after his wife left the State Department – to celebrate the Chagourys’ reclamation of 5 million square meters of land, a critical juncture in the project.

Smiling and animated, Mr. Clinton was photographed conferring with Gilbert Chagoury and Jeffrey J. Hawkins, the consul general for the State Department in Nigeria. Twenty-seven days later, when William P. Franklin would order aides to begin exploring the acquisition of land from South Energyx, the Chagoury-owned company, Hawkins would be one of four State Department officials copied on Franklin’s email.

“A month after Bill Clinton visits a Gilbert and Ronald Chagoury-run land project in Nigeria, the U.S. State Department wants to buy the same land,” said David N. Bossie, president of Citizens United, the conservative advocacy group whose litigation against the State Department pried loose the Franklin email and accompanying letter. “Who could be so lucky? A major donor to the Clinton Foundation, that’s who.”

Queried by Fox News about the matter, the State Department said its officials had “prioritized” the search for a new consulate location in Lagos back in 2011 – when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state – and that an “independent international real estate firm” had identified Eko Atlantic as a potential site the following year.

“Our site search process … is managed by career real estate professionals in the Bureau of Overseas Building Operations, with input from independent real estate firms and other department stakeholders,” said Elizabeth Trudeau, a State Department spokeswoman, at a briefing for reporters on Monday. “The department has had conversations with multiple property owners and their representatives about the possibility of acquiring property for a new consulate in Lagos.”

Trudeau could not explain why a “prioritized” mission had dragged on for five years without success, noting only that “acquiring property that’s appropriate” for a diplomatic facility can be “a long process.” Asked if Secretary Clinton had been aware of her department’s identification of the Chagoury-owned land as a potential site for a consulate, Trudeau replied: “I’m not aware she was.”

The Clinton campaign did not respond to a request for comment. Mark Corallo, a Washington-based spokesman for Gilbert Chagoury, said in a statement that given the project’s “state-of-the-art urban design,” including advanced telecommunications and security features, “it should come as no surprise that the United States government and other governments from around the world are considering Eko Atlantic as a new opportunity for locating their offices that operate in Lagos.”

John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and Fox News contributor, said the entire series of events involving the Clintons and the Chagourys appeared, at a minimum, poorly handled to insulate Secretary Clinton from conflict of interest charges.

“The impression left is that there’s favoritism involved,” Bolton said. “And it’s just very unusual in State Department real estate and housing transactions overseas to have this kind of focus on someone with such clear financial connections to even the departed secretary of state. Normally, there’s much more competitive activity involved, [of] which we haven’t seen any evidence from the State Department.”

Experts agreed the March 2013 email from William P. Franklin to Mary E. Davis, triggering the State Department’s letter to Ronald Chagoury for a possible real estate transaction, would likely have formed only one set of documents in a longer trail that would have dated back to 2012 – the year the State Department said Eko Atlantic had been identified as a potential site for a new consulate.

Such a trail would presumably include internal correspondence addressing the suitability of the Eko Atlantic site and, perhaps, flagging the potential conflict of interest that could be cited, given the longstanding ties between the Clintons and the Chagourys.

But Citizens United said no other documents on the consulate-scouting effort were turned over by the State Department. The group filed its initial Freedom of Information Act request with the State Department for records relating to Gilbert Chagoury back in 2014, and, receiving no reply, filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in April 2015.
More...
This is just business as usual for the Clintons.
 
It's a strange phenomenon to watch democrats in total denial that Hillary is utterly corrupt and that Bill is a monster whom she has enabled.

They can support whomever they want, but in my eyes they have lost any and all credibility when it comes to demanding ethics in government. That is something that only applies to republicans apparently.

The recent prosecution of the democrat PA AG is an aberration, explainable only as the result of a bitter intra-party battle.

Far more typical are the cases of former VA Governor Bob McConnell and the sailor prosecuted for taking a few pics of his sub. Neither did anything remotely comparable to the wholesale corruption of the Clintons but both were aggressively prosecuted by Obama's Justice Department.
 
For liberals, the end almost always justifies the means.

Wonkette: You Can Assault Women And Still Be A Good Feminist
CjKJka8WYAAWhY2.jpg:medium

AUGUST 17, 2016 By Bre Payton

Wonkette’s Rebecca Schoenkopf thinks Bill Clinton probably raped Juanita Broaddrick back in 1978 — but that doesn’t make him a bad person.

In a post published in response to Broaddrick’s recent interview about the alleged attack, Schoenkopf explained Bill probably just didn’t know that forcing himself upon a woman was a no-no — because apparently no one told men not to rape 30 years ago.


“I can absolutely see Bill Clinton doing this (then, not now) and not even thinking of it as rape, but thinking of it as dominant, alpha sex,” Schoenkopf writes. “I can see a LOT of men doing that during that time period, before we started telling them in the ’80s, ‘hey, that is rape, do not do that.’ I can see YOUR NICE GRANDPA doing that, back then.”

For the record, neither of my grandfathers are rapists. I would venture to say that most people’s grandfathers are not rapists because most men don’t rape, and the ones who do are bad.

Schoenkopf continues to defend Bill’s alleged actions, in a super-disturbing string of nonsense.

“To sum up, I think Bill Clinton could very well have raped Juanita Broaddrick,” she writes. “It doesn’t make him an evil man, or irredeemable (I’m Catholic; we’re all forgiven, if we’re sorry, and Broaddrick says Bill Clinton personally called her up to apologize). It doesn’t even necessarily make him a bad feminist — you know, later, once he stops doing that.”

No, Bill Clinton was not convicted for raping Broaddrick, but Schoenkopf’s rationale (he is probably a rapist, but who cares) is really quite stomach-churning. Hate to break it to ya, Rebecca, but raping a woman results in the automatic termination of one’s feminist card. A man who sexually violates a woman doesn’t have the right to be considered a feminist, let alone a decent human being, because he’s clearly demonstrated that he doesn’t have women’s best interests in mind.

Saying you’re sorry isn’t a get-out-of-jail-free card, either. It’s good if you do that, but it shouldn’t mean giving your victim no justice. Rape is rape, after all.

As if that’s not bad enough, Schoenkopf proceeds to gaslight Broaddrick’s account of Hillary’s attempts to silence her. Schoenkopf seems to think Hillary Clinton isn’t capable of minimizing a rape victim’s claims and protecting abusers.

In reality, Clinton has long been an enabler of sexual predators and has even laughed about it. She once called Monica Lewinsky, the White House intern Hillary’s husband took advantage of during his time in the Oval Office, a “narcissistic loony toon.” Kathleen Wiley, who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault in 1993, said Hillary went out of her way to verbally beat her down in order to delegitimize the accusations.

Hillary is still up to her old victim-blaming tricks. Earlier this week, her campaign scrubbed a line from her site that said rape victims have the right to be believed.

The Clintons obviously have never cared about sexual assault victims, and they never will. Throughout his entire political career, Bill has been a serial philanderer, leaving behind a trail of broken women whom Hillary laughs at and brow-beats. And that’s exactly what makes them bad people.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/08/17/wonkette-you-can-assault-women-and-still-be-a-good-feminist/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top