The Clinton Chronicles

Hillary "cankles" Clinton is a disgusting human being.

EXCLUSIVE: Child rape victim comes forward for the first time in 40 years to call Hillary Clinton a 'liar' who defended her rapist by smearing her, blocking evidence and callously laughing that she knew he was guilty

  • 'Hillary Clinton is not for women and children,' says Kathy Shelton, 54, who was 12 years old when she was raped by Thomas Alfred Taylor in Arkansas
  • Clinton was the rapist's defense lawyer, pleading him down to 'unlawful fondling of a minor'
  • The 41-year-old drifter served less than a year in prison
  • The plea came after Clinton was able to block the admission of forensic evidence that linked her client to the crime
  • Shelton says she's furious that Clinton has been portraying herself as a lifelong advocate of women and girls on the campaign trail
  • Clinton accused Shelton of 'seeking out older men' in the case and demanded that she undergo a grueling court-ordered psychiatric examination
  • The presidential candidate later laughed while discussing aspects of the case in a recently-unearthed audiotaped interview from the 1980s


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ously-laughing-knew-guilty.html#ixzz4GrB15Jyx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
She lacks the judgement to be president.

The first casualty of Hillary Clinton’s server
There are consequences to compromising national security
rtr4ui8d.jpg


ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Exactly how damaging the classified information is that was discovered on Hillary Clinton’s server became clear this weekend when the Iranian government executed an alleged spy. He had been mentioned in at least one email from an aide to Hillary, which called him “our friend.”

The deceased Iranian was the nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri, who was executed for allegedly passing on information to the United States. Amiri had been in and out of the news since 2009 when he first defected, eventually turning up on our shores. After a series of contradictory appearances on YouTube and other videos in which he repeatedly changed his mind about residence in America, he returned home to be with his family. Then in 2010 he disappeared, presumably was put under arrest, and ultimately, according to an Iranian government spokesman, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, “was hanged [this past Sunday] for revealing the country’s top secrets to the enemy.” That would be the United States, the West’s preeminent force in agreeing to President Obama’s reckless nuclear deal with Iran. The Iranian government calls us “the enemy.”

I have long argued that Hillary Clinton is incompetent and sometimes dangerous to those around her. If elected president she will be a danger to the country. Our president claims, “There has never been any man or woman more qualified for this office than Hillary Clinton.” This is sheerest pishposh. His qualification for office was being a community activist.


Actually, I have, after reviewing Hillary’s record over the years, devised a fitting term for her achievement: “the Clinton Curse.” For in her wake she has left an astounding number of casualties. Back in Arkansas there were the McDougals, Jim and Susan, who were the Clintons’ partners in the failed Whitewater land deal. They went to the hoosegow, Jim never to return. The Clintons escaped judgment. There was Hillary’s law partner, Webb Hubbell. He, too, ended up in jail. Another victim of the Clinton Curse was former Gov. Jim Guy Tucker. I knew Jim Guy before he went to jail. He was a typical member of the Arkansas political machine, very amiable and very shifty.

Then there was Vince Foster, Hillary’s law partner from the ill-starred Rose Law Firm. He followed her to the White House. He was once, as had been reported at the time of his death, romantically involved with Hillary. Former Secret Serviceman Gary Byrne in his recent New York Times bestseller, “Crisis of Character,” reports that a vindictive Hillary blamed Foster for the Clintons’ early White House troubles. She humiliated him before the White House staff, and the distraught Foster went to Fort Marcy Park in Virginia and shot himself to death.

There are more recent victims of the Clinton Curse. There are various members of her State Department staff who accumulated huge legal bills defending themselves from the FBI. None got off lightly, and poor Huma Abedin is still tied to that lunkheaded exhibitionist, ex-congressman Anthony Weiner. He undoubtedly chose our racy ex-President, Bill Clinton, as a role model, and by the way, Bill looks to be at death’s door or am I just a health nut?

Yet now we are opening a new chapter on the Clinton Curse with her errant server and all her exposed classified and unclassified information. How many more innocent or compromised people living abroad will be executed because Hillary was not, as FBI Director James Comey said, “actually particularly sophisticated with respect to classified information.” And remember, if you will, our president’s ignorant boast about her qualifications.

I think a young United States senator who happens to be a generation younger thanHillary, and a war hero to boot, summed up the death of Shahram Amiri best. Sen. Tom Cotton said over the weekend on “Face the Nation”: “That goes to show just how reckless and careless her decision was to put that kind of highly classified information on a private server. I think her judgment is not suited to keep this country safe.” Mr. Cotton is from the great state of Arkansas. He has seen the Clinton Curse up close.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/9/shahram-amiri-the-first-casualty-of-hillary-clinto/
 
Last edited:
Raw Video. Unedited.

Hillary coughing fits. Uncontrollable coughing, since 2008



Watch the first three minutes. Unedited. She had a partial siezure



FOX news picks it up. Hillary unwell. Diazpam pen carried by handler.

 
Clinton Scandal: 44 More Lies Turn Up In Hillary's Emails
600x39943.jpg

Election 2016: Judicial Watch, which has been doing all the heavy lifting to expose the extent of Hillary Clinton's scandalous use of a private email account while secretary of state, released dozens of emails on Tuesday that shouldn't exist.

For more than a year, Clinton insisted that she didn't use her private email account until after March 18, 2009, since those were the earliest emails she turned over to the State Department. According to Clinton, before that date, she was using an old Blackberry email account, to which she no longer had access.

Her campaign website continues to make this claim: "Early in her term, Clinton continued using an att.blackberry.net account that she had used during her Senate service."

Yet in March, Judicial Watch unearthed several emails to and from Hillary's private email account in February. And this week, it released more than 30 emailsthat predate the time Clinton claims she started using her clintonemail.com account, along with other work emails sent in April 2009 that she never turned over, despite her claims to the contrary. The combined total adds up to 44 newly unearthed email exchanges.

These emails are mostly mundane exchanges between Clinton and her top aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills. But in one exchange, Morgan Stanley Asia Chairman Stephen Roach shares testimony he is about to give to Congress about China's monetary and trade policies. "Can he come to the embassy" while she is in Beijing, Clinton asks. As Judicial Watch points out, Morgan Stanley has been "a long-time financial supporter of the Clintons."

The emails Judicial Watch released in March showed Clinton's battle with security officials over attempts to get her a secure Blackberry.

But beyond the content, the new emails are important for a number of reasons.

First, they show that Clinton was -- and still is -- lying about when she started using her clintonemail.com account. In fact, the latest batch of emails prove that her private email address was already in wide circulation long before she claimed she started using it.

In addition to Morgan Stanley's Roach, the list of those who sent emails to Clinton's allegedly inactive email address includes Strobe Talbott, president of the Brookings Institution (a large, liberal think tank in Washington); Burns Strider, Hillary's "faith guru" and founding partner of the Eleison Group consulting firm; Dan Utech, who had just been named a senior adviser to Energy Secretary Steven Chu; Clinton friend Marty Torrey; and Sandy Berger, who was Bill Clinton's National Security Adviser.

Second, these emails where Clinton is conducting State Department business were being sent and received at a time when Clinton's server was completely unprotected.

Shortly after the email story broke in March 2015, Salt Lake City-based security firm Venafi discovered that "for the first three months of Secretary Clinton's term, access to the server was not encrypted or authenticated with a digital certificate."

In other words, from January through March, it was wide open to hackers who might want to steal personal information.

During those months, Clinton had visited countries "known to have active eavesdropping campaigns," Venafi vice president Kevin Bocek told Fortune more than a year ago.

At the time, this finding didn't appear to mean much since Clinton was claiming that she wasn't using this email account. Now we know she was.

It is also worth noting that these emails turned up only after a State Department search of Huma Abedin's computer files. So who knows how many more emails Clinton sent and received during her first three months in office that haven't seen the light of day -- and probably never will.

Clinton is a bold-faced -- if not pathological -- liar. She very likely compromised national security. She was reckless and cavalier. She mostly likely broke the law, a fact even the FBI acknowledged when it dismissed the case. And the way things are going, she is likely to be the next president of the United States.

Heaven help us.

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...email-account-hillary-swears-she-wasnt-using/
 
90


Hillary Clinton finds another way to avoid the press

Her campaign launches a podcast with an on-payroll moderator whose first interview is the nominee herself.

By ANNIE KARNI

08/12/16 03:21 PM EDT

Updated 08/12/16 03:47 PM EDT

One of Hillary Clinton’s first sitdown interviews since the Democratic National Convention was conducted by a self-described supporter who has been hired by the campaign to host the Democratic nominee’s official campaign podcast.

“With Her,” which launched on iTunes Friday morning, promises an inside account “straight from Hillary [of] what life is like on the campaign trail.” The series is being produced by the campaign and hosted by Max Linsky, a founding editor of Longform.org and a co-host of the well-respected Longform podcast. The debut episode features Linsky’s 15-minute interview with the nominee.

The result is a casual conversation that steers clear of politics -- and it's the latest example of how Clinton is trying to control her storyline. She has been criticized for limiting press access by not participating in press conferences and being slow to grant reporters the level of access that has become common and expected of candidates vying for the Oval Office.

Now, she has gone a step further, creating a safe space from which to present the image of herself that she wants voters to see.

“You can call me whatever you want to call me,” a relaxed-sounding Clinton tells Linsky. “You can call me Hillary, you can call me Madam Secretary. You can call me, ‘hey you.’” (He settles for “Hillary.”)

With 87 days to go to until the election, Donald Trump’s name does not come up once in the conversation. Nor is there any discussion of new emails that have once again raised questions about the relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton-lead State Department.

Instead, Linsky appears more interested in getting Clinton to discuss the emotional and human experience of running for president. He asks her what was going through her mind after hugging her daughter on stage at the convention (spoiler alert: “such a rush of emotion”), how she keeps up her stamina, how she stays engaged with the people she’s meeting and what she thinks about before she goes to bed.

Clinton chats about the iPhone ringtone she employs as an alarm clock, Facetiming with her grandchildren, and how she plans to end a day of campaigning in Miami with a meal of Cuban food and locally brewed beers.

But getting new and specific details about life on the campaign trail can prove difficult with a guarded and practiced interviewee. “I usually get up, get dressed, get out the door,” Clinton explains of her morning routine. “I get a big briefing in my phone and a paper version and I go through that. There’s a regular routine for every day.”

Linsky, a well-respected podcast host, told POLITICO that he was given no specific ground rules for his interview with Clinton. But his access to the candidate comes from being on the campaign’s official payroll.

“She's taking a page from President Obama's playbook -- using in-house videos, blogs, photographs, etc. — to tightly control his message,” said Democratic strategist Lis Smith, a former top adviser to onetime presidential candidate Martin O’Malley. “Where she deviates — and where it should be troubling for the press and public — is that she has massive trust issues that could be addressed with more transparency, and she refuses to hold press conferences.”

The new podcast is not the only way the campaign is trying to tell its own story by seeming to attempt an end-run around the reporters who cover it.

For months, the campaign has been relying on its in-house videographer, Julie Zuckerbrod, to film closed-to-the-press meetings and personal moments Clinton and other top campaign officials share with supporters and staff. The most flattering moments are often turned into slick web videos and ads released by the campaign, rather than reported on by the press.

In an interview, Linsky made it clear that he doesn’t consider his unique access to the candidate and the campaign a substitute for objective coverage of her campaign.

“It’s not journalism,” Linsky said in an interview. “It’s a different thing, which doesn’t mean it’s not interesting, or true. But it’s a different mechanism and it’s newly important to make that distinction.”

Linsky — who with his business partner Jenna Weiss-Berman co-founded the podcast production company Pineapple Street Media earlier this year — delivers a disclaimer at the top of his interview: “I’m not a journalist, and I’m not impartial. I’m a small business owner, a huge supporter of Secretary Clinton’s, and I’m thrilled her campaign is having me do this.”

He said it was important to him for listeners to understand exactly what they were getting. “It’s being produced by the campaign,” he said. “I didn’t want there to be any confusion about what we were doing.”

Clinton has participated in some independent podcasts interviews, as well. She recently sat down for an extended interview with Vox's Ezra Klein, and last April, she was a guest on POLITICO's own "Off Message" podcast. Since the convention, Clinton also sat for an interview with Chris Wallace on the adversarial Fox News.

Her in-housepodcast project has been months in the making and is being overseen by Katie Dowd, the campaign’s digital director. The campaign, Linsky said, has been interested in launching its own podcast since Clinton was a guest on BuzzFeed’s popular “Another Round” podcast in October, 2015. That interview provided her with a funny, conversational platform that showed off a looser side of Clinton, and led to original insights, like the admission that Clinton doesn’t physically produce any sweat.

Weiss-Berman, Linsky’s business partner, at the time produced the audio for BuzzFeed’s podcasts and stayed in touch with the campaign.

After starting their own podcast company, Weiss-Berman “came to the campaign with the idea,” said Linsky. “They’d been saying they want to do a podcast. She raised the idea of doing a campaign journal, and to give a 360-degree view of a presidential campaign. That was what they were into, too. They thought of podcast listeners as an audience writ-large that they’d like to meet. It’s a group of people they’re trying to reach.” It’s also another vehicle to collect voter information. At the end of the broadcast, Clinton tells listeners to text “podcast” to her campaign number, where their information can then be collected for future updates from the campaign.

A campaign official said that the podcast “will come out periodically to show the unexpected and excited nature of campaign life. It will highlight Hillary Clinton and her campaign staff’s experiences and stories from the campaign trail.” The campaign did not respond to requests for comment about whether that would come in lieu of interviews with independent news outlets.

Linsky hasn’t taped his second episode yet, but promised that listeners will hear “from all facets of the campaign, other big names. But we’d also love to talk to someone in the field, and try and get all the way up and down the campaign.”

Linsky and Weiss-Berman are being paid by the campaign, but Linsky said his interview was not substantively edited after the recording earlier this week in Miami. And even if it’s not journalism, Linsky said he’s just asking the questions he’s personally interested in learning about. “What we’re trying to do is provide this window into the campaign and focus on how it feels,” he said. “That’s what I’m interested in.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/hillary-clinton-podcast-campaign-226965#ixzz4H9tKFQtO
 
The Clintons’ Crumbling Foundations
NOAH ROTHMAN / AUG. 10, 2016
hillary-clinton-foundation-money-cash.jpg

If there was going to be a “smoking gun” in relation to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s scandalous “homebrew” email server, it was going to be one that exposed a link between the Clinton family’s private charitable organization and the Democratic nominee’s role as America’s chief diplomat. It now seems that Clinton wasn’t merely “extremely careless” with sensitive documents related to American national security, as FBI Director James Comey insisted, but that she was equally reckless in maintaining a separation between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department.

Emails obtained recently by Judicial Watch, which had been sent and received by close Clinton associates, suggest that the State Department played an important role in keeping Clinton Foundation members and donors happy.

One incriminating email exchange features former Clinton Foundation senior administrator Doug Band requesting that Clinton confidante and State Department aide Huma Abedin “take care of” an individual whose name was redacted. She replied that “personnel has been sending him options.” Band left the State Department in 2011 to take on a role at Teneo Holdings, an international consulting firm that later hired Abedin to perform consulting work even while she still occupied a senior role at the State Department.

In another email sent by Band to Abedin and close Clinton associate and then-chief of staff to the Secretary of State Cheryl Mills, he requested that they put the wealthy and connected Lebanese-Nigerian businessman Gilbert Chagoury in touch with a State Department “substance person” in Lebanon. Abedin replied by noting that she would put Chagoury in touch with Jeff Feltman, who was America’s ambassador to Lebanon at the time. Chagoury is believed to be a prolific donator to the Clinton Foundation and may have also contributed thousands to outside organizations that financially supported Bill Clinton’s 1996 reelection campaign.

The implication in these email communications is that those with close connections to the Clinton Foundation had easy access to the Secretary of State’s office, and received quick and unusual assistance in their queries—some of which appear to be employment-related. If proven, that would be a clear violation of an ethics agreement signed by Clinton Foundation chairman (then CEO) Bruce Linsey and senior advisor to President Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, in 2009 as a precondition for Clinton’s appointment to serve as Secretary of State.

This isn’t the first indication that Hillary Clinton did not observe the kind of moiety mandated in that agreement between the family foundation’s activities and those related to American national affairs. In the spring of 2015, the New York Times revealed that Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved (as did a Cabinet-level commission) the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium production capacity to a Russian-based firm in 2013 despite national security concerns. But as State was reviewing this deal, the Clinton Foundation accepted a $2.35 million donation from the company purchasing U.S. uranium production, a firm that was soon to be transferred directly into the control of the Russian state.

The Clinton Foundation received donations from unsavory states with checkered human rights records like Brunei and Saudi Arabia while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State. “In one instance, foundation officials acknowledged they should have sought approval in 2010 from the State Department ethics office, as required by the agreement for new government donors, before accepting a $500,000 donation from the Algerian government,” the Washington Post reported in 2015.

According to Newsweek’s reporting in 2015, Ukrainian financier and Clinton Foundation donor Victor Pinchuk facilitated the 2011-2012 transfer to Iran of a variety of oil and gas-production materials in violation of sanctions against the Islamic Republic. Pinchuk and the firms he controlled may have been subject to American penalties for these deals. But Pinchuk was also the single largest contributor to the Clinton Foundation at the time. He partied with former President Bill Clinton in the French Alps, attended the inauguration of Clinton’s presidential library, and joined the 42nd President to celebrate his 65th birthday in 2011.

“The FBI went to Justice Department earlier this year asking for it to open a case into the foundation, but the public integrity unit declined,” CNN revealed on Wednesday. “The Justice Department had looked into whether it should open a case on the foundation a year prior and found it didn’t have sufficient evidence to do so.” It’s not entirely clear what in all of this does not rise to merit the Justice Department’s attention. If there is no fire here, the smoke is practically suffocating.

The Clinton Foundation stinks. We haven’t heard the last revelations about its dubious deals or Hillary Clinton’s contemptuous conduct as Secretary of State.

https://www.commentarymagazine.com/american-society/the-clinton-foundation-scandals/
 
Alex Jones reporting secret service contacted infowars directly -- Hillary has Parkinson's disease, her health is detoriating quickly, they think she'll have a major medical event on live tv. Bright flashes and strobe lights trigger a seizure
 
Hillary Clinton: Nowhere girl
Her economic plan would leave the U.S. flirting with recession

By Stephen Moore - - Sunday, August 14, 2016

She’s a real nowhere girl. Sitting in her nowhere world. Making all her nowhere plans for nobody.

Poor Hillary Clinton. She’s trying so fervently to come up with at least one new, inspiring idea to jump-start a moribund economy and help the financially stressed-out middle class. She’s like the economics professor in “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off”: “Anyone? Anyone?” But the left’s idea cupboard is pitifully empty. They literally, not figuratively, have nothing to offer except tax, spend, spin and then hit the button again.

So in her speech on Thursday on the economy, she proposed last week’s leftover cold porridge. And it doesn’t taste any better today than when President Obama first served it up.

In her missive on the economy, Hillary pledged a jobs program “within my first hundred days in office.” Sure. But her former boss, Barack Obama, has had not just 100 but closer to 3,000 days to come up with a jobs program. Where are the jobs? Where are the pay raises? Where is the growth?

Hillary is in the awkward position of having to praise the Obama recovery that has flatlined paychecks, left 94 million Americans outside the labor force, created the biggest deficits and national debt in world history, and has almost half of Americans thinking we are still in a recession or headed into a new one. Two-thirds of Americans think the American Dream is dead. Yet Hillary with a straight face complains that Mr. Obama doesn’t “get the credit he deserves” for the condition of the U.S. economy.

Of course, this actually is a good economy if you are one of those lucky few who can leverage political connections to give $250,000 speeches to Goldman Sachs. Then everything looks peachy.

What is the Hillary agenda, exactly? She’s touting “bold ideas” such as raising the minimum wage, making rich people pay more taxes, $250 billion more government spending on public works projects to featherbed her union pals.

We’ve had three minimum-wage increases this past decade and countless state and municipalities have gone as high as $10, $12 or even $15 an hour. This isn’t new. Mr. Obama has raised income taxes, estate taxes, dividend taxes, capital gains taxes, Medicare taxes, drug and vaccine taxes — all aimed at the rich. Income inequality has gotten worse under Mr. Obama.

She also wants free college tuition for the middle class, which just means people will pay for college through their taxes, not their tuition payments. That will obviously drive up college costs, just as the student loans have triggered dollar-for-dollar tuition hikes at major universities. (Donald Trump should declare no more federal aid to any college that has more than a $500 million endowment. The universities have become storehouses of wealth and it is time they use that money to make their schools affordable.)

On Obamacare, she promises to “double-down.” Wow. Nearly every single day we get more bad news on Obamacare. It’s the Hindenburg of health care. Costs and premiums are rising in many states by double digits, the health care exchanges are going bankrupt, businesses are restricting hiring and hours worked to get around the law, and insurance companies are dropping out. Other than that, it has been a glorious success.

She wants to raise the capital gains tax to 46 percent. She wants to raise the tax on pass-through small- and medium-sized businesses to 45 percent. These are direct taxes on American employers and the risk-takers who invest in them. And if people are really successful in business and they dare get rich, the government will snatch almost half of their lifetime savings in taxes when they die under Hillary’s plan.

What kind of upside-down economic theory tells you that the way to get more jobs is to place higher taxes on the businesses that create the jobs? I have invented a term for this: economic bimboism. Mr. Trump needs to make this point over and over: He wants to tax businesses at 15 percent. She wants to tax them at 45 percent. Then ask the American people: Which will bring more jobs to America?

The Tax Foundation says that the Clinton tax and economic plan will actually reduce jobs by 300,000 and subtract from our already weakling economic growth rate. That means we will be flirting with recession.

In short, this nowhere girl has a nowhere plan — for nobody.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/14/hillary-clinton-has-no-home-base-of-support/
 
Back
Top