The Clinton Chronicles
- Thread starter Tom B
- Start date
lol
Hillary Clinton’s new health woe: email Alzheimer’s
Call it “email Alzheimers”: Hillary Clinton’s remarkable failure to recall much of anything touching on how she managed to grossly violate security protocols in her years heading the State Department.
Clinton this week had to supply written, sworn answers to 25 questions from the good-government group Judicial Watch about her home-brewed email setup. On 21 of the 25, she came up with one version or another of, “I forget.”
Which, as any lawyer will tell you, is the best way to avoid both self-incrimination and perjury.
Here’s one example of what her lawyers supplied: “Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall being advised, cautioned, or warned, she does not recall that it was ever suggested to her, and she does not recall participating in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that her use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department businesses conflicted with or violated federal record-keeping laws.”
We’d like to suggest this raises new health worries — but we’d have to believe these memory failures were real.
As it is, we’ll second the comment from Judicial Watch: Clinton’s “refusal to answer many of the questions in a clear and straightforward manner further reflects disdain for the rule of law.”
We agree. Then again, Hillary Clinton probably doesn’t recall what the rule of law looks like.
http://nypost.com/2016/10/14/hillary-clintons-new-health-woe-email-alzheimers/
Call it “email Alzheimers”: Hillary Clinton’s remarkable failure to recall much of anything touching on how she managed to grossly violate security protocols in her years heading the State Department.
Clinton this week had to supply written, sworn answers to 25 questions from the good-government group Judicial Watch about her home-brewed email setup. On 21 of the 25, she came up with one version or another of, “I forget.”
Which, as any lawyer will tell you, is the best way to avoid both self-incrimination and perjury.
Here’s one example of what her lawyers supplied: “Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall being advised, cautioned, or warned, she does not recall that it was ever suggested to her, and she does not recall participating in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that her use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department businesses conflicted with or violated federal record-keeping laws.”
We’d like to suggest this raises new health worries — but we’d have to believe these memory failures were real.
As it is, we’ll second the comment from Judicial Watch: Clinton’s “refusal to answer many of the questions in a clear and straightforward manner further reflects disdain for the rule of law.”
We agree. Then again, Hillary Clinton probably doesn’t recall what the rule of law looks like.
http://nypost.com/2016/10/14/hillary-clintons-new-health-woe-email-alzheimers/
Haiti and Africa Projects Shed Light on Clinton’s Public-Private Web
By MIKE McINTIREOCT. 16, 2016
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/us/hillary-clinton-cheryl-mills.html
By MIKE McINTIREOCT. 16, 2016
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/us/hillary-clinton-cheryl-mills.html
Wikileaks: Clinton Team’s Sick Reaction to San Bernardino Terror Attack
As part of Sunday’s new WikiLeaks drop, an email chain shows that immediately upon receiving the news that the gunman responsible for the San Bernardino terrorist shooting that left 14 people dead and 22 injured had an Islamic name, top Clinton officials were unhappy and Hillary Clinton chairman John Podesta suggested it would be “better” if a person with an American name had done the shooting.
Matt Ortega, liaison for the Clinton campaign, began the chain by sending out a tweet from MSNBC host Chris Hayes with the email subject line “Tweet | NBC reports a shooter’s name.”
Follow
Christopher Hayes
✔@chrislhayes
NBC News now reporting a US citizen named Sayeed Farouk believed to be one of the people involved in the shooting.
6:16 PM - 2 Dec 2015 · Manhattan, NY, United States
Damn
Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta fired back the following response:
Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.
Breitbart News has reached out to John Podesta via twitter to ask why this would be “better.”
Podesta had not responded at press time.
Madrid couple Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik carried out the attack at a Christmas party held at the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health as an act of jihad against the United States. Farook, an employee of that department, was an American-born citizen of Pakistani descent. His wife, Malik, was a Pakistani-born lawful permanent resident of the United States.
After the shooting, then-primary candidate Donald Trump called for his ban on Muslims entering the United States “until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”
http://www.breitbart.com/wikileaks/...cking-reaction-san-bernardino-terror-aattack/
As part of Sunday’s new WikiLeaks drop, an email chain shows that immediately upon receiving the news that the gunman responsible for the San Bernardino terrorist shooting that left 14 people dead and 22 injured had an Islamic name, top Clinton officials were unhappy and Hillary Clinton chairman John Podesta suggested it would be “better” if a person with an American name had done the shooting.
Matt Ortega, liaison for the Clinton campaign, began the chain by sending out a tweet from MSNBC host Chris Hayes with the email subject line “Tweet | NBC reports a shooter’s name.”
Follow
Christopher Hayes ✔@chrislhayes
NBC News now reporting a US citizen named Sayeed Farouk believed to be one of the people involved in the shooting.
6:16 PM - 2 Dec 2015 · Manhattan, NY, United States
Damn
Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta fired back the following response:
Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.
Breitbart News has reached out to John Podesta via twitter to ask why this would be “better.”
Podesta had not responded at press time.
Madrid couple Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik carried out the attack at a Christmas party held at the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health as an act of jihad against the United States. Farook, an employee of that department, was an American-born citizen of Pakistani descent. His wife, Malik, was a Pakistani-born lawful permanent resident of the United States.
After the shooting, then-primary candidate Donald Trump called for his ban on Muslims entering the United States “until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”
http://www.breitbart.com/wikileaks/...cking-reaction-san-bernardino-terror-aattack/