The Chicago Drunks won't like this

[Haroki]

Quote from Madison:

some significant differences are that a cop on the corner can't store the images he sees indefinitely, can't link his memory with the memory of every other cop, can't correlate his vision with transaction and travel records, and can't transmit a file of his memory to anyone else.

and the obvious retort to the "nothing to worry about if you're not doing anything wrong" line is: it depends on who decides what's "wrong."

ask a chinese guy if it's such a good idea. ask someone who lived in pre-1990 ussr if it's such a good idea to watch people for "wrong" activity. ask a cuban if he doesn't mind the government watching him to make sure he's not "wrong."

will the bushworshippers, giddy about monitoring minorities and abortion clinics, be so enthusiastic about president hillary recording their trips to the gun store?

Yeah, but a camera on the corner can be reviewed by others to make sure the appropriate action was taken.

Question - will it help eliminate the human/adrenaline issue somewhat if the cops KNOW they're being recorded?

So tell me - who DOES decide what's wrong - voters?

Don't you think you're putting the cart before the horse there, comparing US with USSR and China? There's a loooong way to go before we're there.....

Pres Hillary ???? LMAO....

 

[AmbushHillbilly]

Quote from Haroki:

Pres Hillary ???? LMAO....

Seems ABC is getting us used to the idea of a woman president with their "Commander in Chief" show, although I heard mention on TV she "backed in".

It might be a good show, but I find the timing just too coincidental for my tastes.

Good thing there's a Constitutional roadblock in place or Fox might have a competing show with a muscle-bound, thick-accented actor portraying the President.

And I really don't care if either of them watch me walk into (or stumble into) a liquor store on camera.