The calendar spread

Every time I thought I found a calendar position with edge, all the profit was offset during execution by a very wide bid/ask spread.
Yea I agree some have some pretty wide spreads. However if you sit there you should get filled. At least thats my experience. It can be a challenge getting out tho
 
It looks to me that the best way to implement a calendar spread is to buy it when you believe you can price a back month event better than the market. It does not have to be a big event like earnings, it can be something much smaller that will only give the back month a few vol points. Does anyone have ideas? You can also do relative value and buy when implied forward is near lows (more of a buy and hope). This usually offers good r/r tho.
 
Yea I agree some have some pretty wide spreads. However if you sit there you should get filled. At least thats my experience. It can be a challenge getting out tho
Like with any relative value strategy, execution is very important here. You can leg it, work it in COB or quote it with a dealer (last one available to institutional clients only).
 
Like with any relative value strategy, execution is very important here. You can leg it, work it in COB or quote it with a dealer (last one available to institutional clients only).

Closed nflx for 1.60 today. Nice gainer. I put one on JPM and NKE. I think event vol will increase. If your still at work.... G BBTA 1924 <GO>. Switch it from Chart to Table.

I'm not to sure legging is worth the .02 cents I might gain.

If I do leg a spread, should I first get into the one that is least liquid and then the other or long first short leg second regardless of liquidity?
 
If you have a crazy IV of 75 or 100 just before a clinical trials release, would you be willing to pay that kind of price for a strangle or a straddle, knowing that post news release, IV might revert to a historical range of say 20-30 ?
Appreciate your answer. I may do it depend on many factors: If I have very strong convictions and calculated the moves would overcome or > volatility, based on analysis and fundamentals etc.(GILD, BMY, DXCM...). Of course my win rate is only about 50%.
 
Last edited:
  • But the strangle/straddle trade would be directional based - not IV based.
  • The drop in IV is irrelevant.

The price you pay is IV based. I still don't understand how you think strangles straddles are directional.
Let me explain this in simplelist terms. If you buy a stock because you think it will go up that is directional. You buy it for 100 and sell it for 101 you make money.
If you buy strangle/straddle you need a BIG move in a SMALL period. The word BIG and SMALL are not directional words.

If you have a directional bias ie. LULU will go up. You buy the stock because as long as it goes up 1 penny you make money. If you think LULU will move up $10 tomorrow. That is a idea that LULU will experience an increase in volatility to the upside. Now if the call is priced for a $10 move. And you buy that call you lose money EVEN if your DIRECTION was right! So for the love of God, strangles and straddles are directional plays!!!
 
Last edited:
The price you pay is IV based. I still don't understand how you think strangles straddles are directional.


Strangles/straddles are directional trades and IV trades. But mostly directional trades.


  • XYZ at $100
  • Earnings next month.

Directional trader buys a strangle/straddle expecting the stock to move more than enough to offset the cost of the position - he will most likely enter trade close to earnings and exit after earnings. He doesn't care about IV.

Volatility trader buys a strangle/straddle expecting the stock to trade flat but IV to increase as earnings gets closer - he will exit before earnings. His intention is to capture the increased IV.
 
Back
Top