I'm not hear to make friends. And if you don't like arguing here's one thing you can do: stop responding to my replies to other people.Quote from Tsing Tao:
So, in your example, the two kids have income, do they? You know what, Ricter, you just argue for the sake of arguing. That's all you do.
Quote from Ricter:
I'm not hear to make friends. And if you don't like arguing here's one thing you can do: stop responding to my replies to other people.
Anyway, one kid has a paper route, the other kid gets an allowance, and mom works part-time temping. Would it be fair that they all pay 25% of the grocery bill? (Assuming they all eat 25% of the food each. : ))
Perhaps I'm not getting at my point directly enough, which is of course "marginal utility". It is not fair to take 20% of income from a poor family whose income less expenses leave them with squat, and take an "equal" rate from a wealthy family. And if the solution to that is an exemption or subsidy for incomes "below x", then you have created at least a two tier tax system.Quote from Tsing Tao:
No, it would be fair to say they all pay whatever flat rate on their income. That's the whole point behind a flat, fair tax. So if little Johnny had a paper route and made $25 per week, he'd pay 20% on that - $5. Dad would pay 20% on his $50,000 a year salary - $10,000. Dad would still pay a hell of a lot more, just fairly. Has nothing to do with how much they consume.
As for you not being "hear" to make friends, you do a good job of it (not making friends). One thing you're actually good at. I don't mind arguing topics, but not for the sake of just having an argument. That would make me a troll like you.
For instance, you don't see me arguing shit like the fact that an allowance or paper route isn't taxable. That's what I'd do if I were just picking a fight - much like you.
Quote from Ricter:
Perhaps I'm not getting at my point directly enough, which is of course "marginal utility". It is not fair to take 20% of income from a poor family whose income less expenses leave them with squat, and take an "equal" rate from a wealthy family. And if the solution to that is an exemption or subsidy for incomes "below x", then you have created at least a two tier tax system.
.
Quote from Tsing Tao:
No, it would be fair to say they all pay whatever flat rate on their income. That's the whole point behind a flat, fair tax. So if little Johnny had a paper route and made $25 per week, he'd pay 20% on that - $5. Dad would pay 20% on his $50,000 a year salary - $10,000. Dad would still pay a hell of a lot more, just fairly. Has nothing to do with how much they consume.
As for you not being "hear" to make friends, you do a good job of it (not making friends). One thing you're actually good at. I don't mind arguing topics, but not for the sake of just having an argument. That would make me a troll like you.
For instance, you don't see me arguing shit like the fact that an allowance or paper route isn't taxable. That's what I'd do if I were just picking a fight - much like you.
Quote from Scataphagos:
Why do you guys bother to suffer the rantings of Ricter? He obviously has the grey matter of a Grape Nut.