I suppose that was addressed to Iran and the article you posted, right? Cause you and the article are the ones who try to justify the wrong of kidnapping british sailors with the alleged wrong of alleged capture of Iranians by the US in Iraq. Cause even if what the article says is true (and it's a big if), kidnapping british not american sailors in retaliation for the actions of the US military in Iraq IS NOT NICE.
The botched US raid that led to the hostage crisis
- Thread starter ZZZzzzzzzz
- Start date
The article sounds like more wild eyed speculation being passed off as fact. Slurp up that kool-aid.....yummy!
Quote from tradermaji:
Yeah Alex... but it does not fit into the war mongering attitude of the klansmen. They have been neutered by the US voters during the 2006 elections, but they are still bent on wreaking havoc round the world. The kool aid drinkers on this forum wants to believe that Iran is the cause of all evil, just as they still believe in the Iraqi WMDs.
Tradermaji translated: the Iranians had every right to take British hostages, even though it was a "blotched US raid" (had nothing to do with England).
Its the same diarrhea we hear everyday from pieces of islamic scum, and many of their good friends on the democrat party. Who is the kool aid drinker?
This story is typical Euro-whining. All their problems are our fault. The fact is that Britain foolishly allowed its sailors to be sent into harm's way under ridiculous UN-dictated rules of engagment and then so failed to maintain vigilence that a fleet of Iranian patrol craft was able to surround their boats. Now they compound matters by basically begging the Iranians to come up with some way they can grovel to get their sailors back.
Let's have a reality check. Hostage-taking has been a staple of the islamist thugs who control iran for 30 years. If I were the British, I'd be worried less about these sailors and more about the personnel at the British Embassy in Tehran. Iranian-sponsored hezbollah took American CIA agents hostage in Lebanon and tortured them to death. Whatever we do to those bastards is warranted, in my view. If we had a chance to capture the head of intelligence for the Republican Guards, we would have been grossly negligent to miss it. The way to deal with an
Iranian response is to hit them back ten times as hard. Not get on your knees like Tony Blair is doing.
In a way we are responsible for the Iranian trouble-making. When they started meddling in Iraq years ago, we should have warned them off and if they continued, hit them with an all-out attack. Now we and the Brits will have to pay the price for that appeasement. Unfortunately, this is a recurrent theme. We haven't done anything to convince the Syrians that we are serious either.
I think it is pretty clear that the orignal Iraq invasion was a terrible mistake. We have compounded that mstake by trying to conduct a PC occupation, one that let the insurgency get started, that let thugs like al Sadr raise private armies and that tolerates open assistance by Iran and Syria.
Let's have a reality check. Hostage-taking has been a staple of the islamist thugs who control iran for 30 years. If I were the British, I'd be worried less about these sailors and more about the personnel at the British Embassy in Tehran. Iranian-sponsored hezbollah took American CIA agents hostage in Lebanon and tortured them to death. Whatever we do to those bastards is warranted, in my view. If we had a chance to capture the head of intelligence for the Republican Guards, we would have been grossly negligent to miss it. The way to deal with an
Iranian response is to hit them back ten times as hard. Not get on your knees like Tony Blair is doing.
In a way we are responsible for the Iranian trouble-making. When they started meddling in Iraq years ago, we should have warned them off and if they continued, hit them with an all-out attack. Now we and the Brits will have to pay the price for that appeasement. Unfortunately, this is a recurrent theme. We haven't done anything to convince the Syrians that we are serious either.
I think it is pretty clear that the orignal Iraq invasion was a terrible mistake. We have compounded that mstake by trying to conduct a PC occupation, one that let the insurgency get started, that let thugs like al Sadr raise private armies and that tolerates open assistance by Iran and Syria.
The Democrat's have got this covered - literally - in scarf and pure dhimitude fashion.
Can anyone guess if she was handing out H*rshey kisses?
http://news.yahoo.com/photo/070403/481/xhm10404031809
_______
U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, looks at the tomb containing the head of St. John the Baptist inside the historic Ommayad Mosque, during her tour at a popular market in downtown Damascus, Syria, Tuesday April 3, 2007. r
Now you are showing your true colors... proving that you are stupid. One can despise both the Iranian mullahs and the repugniklans... like I do.
Quote from Nick Leeson Jr:
Tradermaji translated: the Iranians had every right to take British hostages, even though it was a "blotched US raid" (had nothing to do with England).
Its the same diarrhea we hear everyday from pieces of islamic scum, and many of their good friends on the democrat party. Who is the kool aid drinker?
You do a pathetic job of translation... please do not try to read or write when you are under the influence of koolaid.
Your reading comprehension is slipping...
Bullshit...I am not rationalizing any wrong of Iran.
See if you can get this through your pea brain...
Both sides can be wrong...
Doh!
See if you can get this through your pea brain...
Both sides can be wrong...
Doh!