The Boss of Central Banks Just Approved Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset.

BIS Explores Allowing Banks to Hold 1% of Reserves in Bitcoin
Alejandro ArriecheLast updated: 4 July 2022
TwitterFacebookLinkedInFlipboardBitcoin (BTC) being one of the assets considered part of this group due to the absence of a counterparty.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision for BIS started to look into the topic of “prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures” for financial institutions back in June 2021 due to the “rapid evolution and volatile nature of the cryptoasset market”.

“While the cryptoasset market remains small relative to the size of the global financial system, and banks’ exposures to cryptoassets are currently limited, its absolute size is meaningful and there continue to be rapid developments”, the Committee’s report states.

The report adds: “The Committee believes that the growth of crypto assets and related services has the potential to raise financial stability concerns and increase risks faced by banks”.

The BIS Plans to Draft a Standard for Cryptos Before the Year Ends
These public consultations are the first step to eventually drafting definite policies in regards to how digital assets must be treated by banks when assessing their risk and, more importantly, when they calculate their risk-weighted assets and how much capital they hold relative to that amount as part of their requirement to comply with the minimum required Tier 1 capital ratio.

The Committee will be receiving opinions and comments from all relevant parties until 30 September 2022 and aims to finalize a standard for the industry before the year ends.

Once the Committee drafts an industry-wide standard, banks would be set free to incorporate crypto assets into their balance sheet contingent on the approval of their respective local authorities.

What Could this Standard Mean for Crypto Adoption by Banks?
Since most countries adhere to Basel and apply most of the rules set forth by this committee, chances are that this would accelerate investments in the crypto market.

However, banks would probably scrutinize first if the potential earnings coming out of these investments justify the large amount that crypto assets would contribute to their risk-weighted asset base as, in some cases, the rules set forth in the Committee’s proposal state demand that group 2 assets are assigned a 1,250% weight on their absolute value.

In practical terms, if a bank targets a 10% minimum tier 1 capital ratio, a $10 exposure to these assets would demand $13.5 in capital to hit that target due to the extensive weight assigned to assets within this group.

This may discourage institutions from increasing their holdings of group 2 assets such as BTC and other similar crypto tokens.

On the other hand, the standardization of how crypto assets are treated by financial institutions could immediately result in higher demand for stablecoins and reserve-backed assets within the crypto ecosystem if banks decide to start offering access and exposure to these innovative financial instruments for their customers.
 
I want everyone to reread the title again and then if you still have a problem with crypto, then look in the mirror and put a 'dumbass' stamp on yo forhead. 1% of banks reserve assets are going to drive this price way up!

Lets read...

CRYPTOCURRENCY NEWS
Bank for International Settlements to allow banks to keep 1% of reserves in Bitcoin

Bank-for-International-Settlements-to-allow-banks-to-keep-1-of-reserves-in-Bitcoin.jpg

Ana
Nicenko
3 days ago
3 mins read

Despite its skeptical approach to digital currencies, exacerbated by the recent cryptocurrency market crash, it looks like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) intends to extend its hand to the new asset class by allowing banks to hold up to 1% of reserves in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC).


Indeed, BIS’s Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has made the proposal for limiting the banks’ total exposures to “Group 2 cryptossets to 1% of Tier 1 capital” in its consultative document titled “Second consultation on the prudential treatment of cryptoassets,” published on June 30.

Group 1 vs. Group 2 assets
Specifically, Group 2 refers to the assets that do not meet classification conditions and includes specific tokenized traditional assets and stablecoins, as well as unbacked crypto assets. As opposed to Group 2, Group 1 includes tokenized traditional assets and stablecoins that meet classification conditions.

kJkSgtU26u-KpNM_MF51p1hIKxEoSxS1O5z1K3C3FxoCLuk4QEUrJxrv0rxTjCNotd5SdOJmP2wgG7J767fdrTjo6Sv9TH_To5dLiJtkH2v8YMiaAAaKbY4hMp0pMl7GcW4sTB0ghNcvf8FOTCo

Group 1 vs. Group 2 assets. Source: Bank of International Settlements
According to the document:

“Banks’ exposures to Group 2 cryptoassets will be subject to an exposure limit. Banks must apply the exposure limit to their aggregate exposures to Group 2 cryptoassets, including both direct holdings (cash and derivatives) and indirect holding (ie those via investment funds, ETF/ETN, special purpose vehicles).”

Related
U.S. 2nd-largest electric power company reportedly explores Bitcoin miningIMF says cryptocurrencies, CBDCs can be more efficient payment options than current onesMexican senator proposes bill to make Bitcoin legal tender

The document also specified that “a bank’s total exposure to Group 2 crypto assets must not be higher than 1% of the bank’s Tier capital at all times,” in line with the Basel Framework which includes all the BCBS’s standards. As it explained:

“The large exposure rules of the Basel Framework are not designed to capture large exposures to an asset type, but to individual counterparties or groups of connected counterparties. This would imply, for example, no large exposure limits on cryptoasset where there is no counterparty, such as Bitcoin.”

With this in mind, “the Committee proposes, therefore, to introduce a new exposure limit for all Group 2 cryptoassets outside of the large exposure rules.” Meanwhile, this provisional limit set at 1% of Tier 1 capital would be reviewed periodically.

Skeptical stance toward crypto
Notably, Finbold earlier reported on the BIS using the recent crypto market collapse to affirm its skeptical attitude towards the assets class and warn about the materialization of its predictions about the dangers of decentralized finance (DeFi).


On top of that, the global central bank body released in early June a bulletin in which it presented its view that “crypto cannot fulfill the social role of money,” listing a number of problems it perceived in the crypto and blockchain industry, including high fees and network congestion that lead to the landscape fragmentation.


w2s2udy9tnl61.jpg
Four words: IT'S NOT LEGAL TENDER. I will not subject myself to that kind of risk, no way no how, so I must be a dumbass?
 
Four words: IT'S NOT LEGAL TENDER. I will not subject myself to that kind of risk, no way no how, so I must be a dumbass?

Yeah according to my first post you are, but then again nobody cares what you do either so you don't have to ask my permission to be one.
 
Back
Top