Quote from Joab:
Yes, I am serious !
Use 2:1 leverage starting with 500k and see IF you can get that return never risking more then 5% max per trade.
If you can post your fills as soon as you can that would be great.
A lot of the 'experts' advise that it is not prudent to risk more than 2% on any trade. Infact, I have read that professional traders often risk much less than 1% per trade. I am sticking to the 2% guideline, at the moment.
However, my gut instinct is that 5% is an acceptable risk for
small accounts IF and ONLY IF a system with a quantifiable edge and low historical drawdowns is being employed. I know that acrary has a thread on position sizing with some very interesting and original ideas. From what I remember, the thread suggests it is ok to risk more than 2% depending on the performance characteristics of the system employed. I intend to study acrary's position sizing ideas in the near future and see if I can incorporate them in FAB TEAM.
Even if I do decide to risk more than 2%, I will still be limited by the amount of capital available, unless I significantly reduce my stop sizes and/or the number of stocks I trade at a time. My model allows me to have 10 or more open positions, which means I can not allocate (assuming 2:1 leverage) more than 20% (it can even be as low as 5% when I have more than 10 open positions) of my capital to one position. Sometimes, this means that I am compelled to risk less than 2% of my capital on a particular position.
Having said that, I believe this obstacle can be overcome with the intelligent use of options. It is one avenue I am keen to pursue, particularly since I will be able to apply some of the stuff I learnt on the CQF.
Joab, what are your views on the 2% risk guideline?