Hihihihi :
Experimenting fractal rules : I have found a funny rule but it is just too recent. For example today I have these numbers (calculation from my model):
4 base min base: 7678.72 proj: 7628.28 05:00 (20:30)
16 proj min base: 7711.35 proj: 7556.77 17:00 (32:30)
112 base max base: 7871.05 proj: 7653.57 113:00 (128:30)
56 proj max base: 7815.53 proj: 7739.24 57:00 (72:30)
The market have followed the path
7556 -> 7711 -> 7628 -> 7653
which corresponds to the apparent logic pattern:
MinTP1 -> Dual MinTP1 ->(replace TP1 by TB1) Dual MinTB1 -> (replace Min by Max) Dual MaxTB1
If we continue with the same logic it will give:
-> (replace TB1 by TP1) Dual MaxTP1: 7815
P.S.: Of course he didn't did exactly 8556 but only 8562 but I think it is enough near to consider that he made 8556.
Experimenting fractal rules : I have found a funny rule but it is just too recent. For example today I have these numbers (calculation from my model):
4 base min base: 7678.72 proj: 7628.28 05:00 (20:30)
16 proj min base: 7711.35 proj: 7556.77 17:00 (32:30)
112 base max base: 7871.05 proj: 7653.57 113:00 (128:30)
56 proj max base: 7815.53 proj: 7739.24 57:00 (72:30)
The market have followed the path
7556 -> 7711 -> 7628 -> 7653
which corresponds to the apparent logic pattern:
MinTP1 -> Dual MinTP1 ->(replace TP1 by TB1) Dual MinTB1 -> (replace Min by Max) Dual MaxTB1
If we continue with the same logic it will give:
-> (replace TB1 by TP1) Dual MaxTP1: 7815
P.S.: Of course he didn't did exactly 8556 but only 8562 but I think it is enough near to consider that he made 8556.
hihihihi