Quote from stock777:
My record on ES calls in realtime venues is exceptional. Even better than I would think possible. Must be the filtering of posting in public.
Could someone reverse engineer it. Possibly , but they would already have to be capable of coming up with the work on their own, so it's a wash.
Yes, you are correct in second paragraph.
Once it becomes easy to originate "flow charts" for other approaches, then most time is spent dealing with how to "bridge onward" to understand the ways in which the overlap of different methods contributes to moving towards the Holy Grail.
Also, I monitor the "pieces" others accept and then incorporate into their approaches. This info tells me better where they are on the spectrum I keep that addresses effectiveness and efficiency.
Most recently I added sun trader to my monitoring list. Probably, I will be drop him this weekend.
Some of the "reads" I look for involve the following:
1. Having all four components required for any system.
2. hold/reversal trading instead of entry/exit.
3. Misuse of data to forward trends when the data has no stat sig (or deductive reasoning sig)
4. Using the market variables correctly with respect to their independent and dependent roles.
5. use of leading indicators of price.
6. knowledge about how trend failures ocur.
7. gating and kills of item 1.
8. Showing interrelationships of OOE's
9. People who know that there are different defined types of trends.
10. People who steal from others.
11. "lucky" events.
12. I will look at those who use the wrong kind of math. I am interested in how the standard of performance is being set.
13. NSF grantees to understand how bad it is in government perception.
14. Knowledgeable in theory of learning.
15. Knowledgable in nuerobiology and neurology.
I rank many PA types in ET. I also note where they use limitations to not allow acquisition of further skills and knowledge.
Lastly, I keep a three ring binder of people who make major transitions to different and better trading plateaux.