The Best TA Book Ever Published!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
It would nice if Marketsurfer understood the basis of research.

As long as there is no fraud, negligent error, or attempt to deceive, then the work of an academic is accepted for what it is, a report of the results of an research experiment. Unless you are willing to state that Professor Hsu and Professor Kuan are guilty of fraud, neither they nor their published work can be "discredited"...get a clue.

With all the wonderful qualifications listed in your CV, one would think that you would know that..unfortunately you are, once again butt naked ass backwards wrong..

Steve
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

the "other" sites? i own/owned/worked with/ or operated the other sites, what on earth are you talking about? let me give you another hint--try google with parenthesis-----

You can't defend your positions so you turn to personal libel--how typical and weak.

let's keep this thread on topic, shall we?



surf :confused:
More...

Libel? So sue me you arrogant ass.

Your bio was written and posted by www.exhedge.com. If it wasn't correct, contact them and change it. You sure aren't denying the content.

www.intrendX.com was either closed or never opened. In my opinion that was probably the highlight of your career.
www.biltmorecapitol.com was never opened according to www.godaddy.com .
And I know how to perform searches, "David Goodboy" produced no matches on any of your accredited sites and "Dave Goodboy" only produced eight matches on www.themoneyblogs.com, all referenced to articles.

In my opinion, typical is your continued attacks on ideas you are clueless to comprehend, weak are your writing skills and non-existent are your research skills.

I don't NEED to defend my position because it is irrelevant. We are not talking about what I do we are talking about TA as a WHOLE. You need to seek professional help. I hear the state of New York has some pretty good indigent care mental health facilities in your area.
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

Real Word Trading.com – www.realworldtrading.com – Website rolls over to www.themoneyblogs.com where a search for David Goodboy finds no matches.

[/B]
More...

There is an interview surfer did for realworldtrading.com with Victor Niederhoffer over at the dailyspeculations site (also some pictures from Spec Party 2005 and 2006).

Of course this has nothing to do with the topic, which has generated over 40 pages of mostly nothing.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

the "other" sites? i own/owned/worked with/ or operated the other sites, what on earth are you talking about? let me give you another hint--try google with parenthesis-----

You can't defend your positions so you turn to personal libel--how typical and weak.

let's keep this thread on topic, shall we?



surf :confused:
More...

Surfer,

If you were serious about keeping the thread on topic you wouldn't have said "how typical and weak" or accused the other party of libel.

You sir, are as much at fault as anyone. I don't give a fig whether the thread stays on topic because the topic is already beaten to death so at least I'm honest. :)
 
I think it's unfortunate, however I am pretty sure some folks out there will decide to at least browse the index over at Amazon (if it is available). As I have said before, I like the book, I think it offers good value to retail daytraders, especially here where folks don't seem to know much about research methods. What else can a person say?


Good luck

Steve
 
Quote from Bernoulli:

There is an interview surfer did for realworldtrading.com with Victor Niederhoffer over at the dailyspeculations site (also some pictures from Spec Party 2005 and 2006).

Of course this has nothing to do with the topic, which has generated over 40 pages of mostly nothing.
More...

I know, realworld rolls over to moneyblogs and that is where the content can be found now. Doesn't matter. The point is the thread was going well till surf's personal attacks started as usual.
 
I tried to post this before but it never showed up. Yes the footnotes in the Introduction are wrong from 14-18 and get back on track at 19. It was my fault not the publishers. It is due to be corrected if the first printing of 3000 sells out. Thanks for mentioning it.
David Aronson
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top