But yes, there are definite point-counter-point patterns,
...channeling
as well as various solos,
...manipulation
ensembles,
...etf's/funds
full up harmonies,
...indexes
free form jazz,
...the language Greenspan used to scat to Congress with
(hey, it's not as if Byrd wasn't being "informed" from somewhere too!)
shrill runs,
...whip-sawing
dirges,
...Black Monday
discordant dissonance,
...after-market trading
lullabies,
...Brahms, not the market
bold fanfares,
...increased volume
childish tempers
...the secondary market
, playful teasing,
...higher lows
and every conceivable human emotion all integrated into one continuous expression of "being".
...Dow Theory
I have previously visualized the market dynamic more as a sea of motion with winds and currents of change. As long as one did not care where they were going it was always possible to be extracting energy and having fun.
...the invisible hand, like a sailing ship with noone at the till -- on God's autopilot.
Clearly, the existence of the box "C" (e.g. C^2) implied by Pythagorean's theorem means that somone is always making money and we should all be dancing on both of the principal Cartesian axis to profit in both directions. Any way, it all implies that a
Pythagorean tuning strategy could be used to resonate with the market for solo fun and profit. But my personal concern here is that such an individual extraction would in the long run be taken by the conductor as a discordant freestyle blasphemy; since the market's Pythagorean nature implies a circle of periodicity related to its radius r. That means all we ever really do is borrow and contribute to the whole. If my suspicions are correct that means no one can have their pi (ð) and eat it too; unless perhaps they eat and run and never come back for another piece.
...loved your contribution though.
cordially,
