The Bern Identity

piezoe said:
At the Breakfast Club.

More...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The laws in the USA is very so discriminate for who break the law. Look at the television to see many hollywoods peoples, many political peoples have drug problem, but NEVER go to the jail for these offense. Why does the USA law incarcerate poor people for drugs, but not incarcerate the hollywood celebrity, or the politicians or child of them? Why is some people (FOR THE SAME OFFENSE) have no jail time? Why?
 
Your TV, your media openly talk about celebrity drugs, party. Politicians and hollywood celebritys have problems with drugs too. This is talked about on your media. Why can these people be to free to talk about their drugs use, but know they are protected from jail? Why do the USA law excuse these people, but incarcerate the people that do not have that money?
 
JFK becomes KFJ

WxbDq0l.jpg
 
fhl said:
More...
That Moinyhan guy is incoherent. He is interested in obfuscation and defending the failed and often corrupt status quo. However, rhetoric like Moinyhans' works very well on people that don't understand world history, let alone the history of ideas and nations and how it can all be seen as a dialogue of theory and empiricism of what works and what doesn't, and what might have worked but no longer does.

Every system of government has a positive and a negative, Communism, Socialism, etc etc. The idea is to try to compose the good ideas like lego into a non-contradictory fair system for all while at the same time increasing the freedom and choices of people. If those good ideas cannot be divorced from the rest of the [often harmful] ideology, for whatever reason, we usually reject them. In theory, that is what progress is, and what Political Science tries to study.

That the Bern is a student of Communism, Socialism and world history in general shows that the Bern is a thoughtful leader trying to make the best stew possible out of a history of mishmash, not an incoherent pundit that is at best being dishonest. That he lives in the US means he absolutely believes that Democracy is the best current system. But like any model, it needs to be examined for outdated ideas. Otherwise government is just like religion that cannot get out of it's own way toward progress.

There is no contradiction or is it illogical in what the Bern says. Only open dialogue and honesty.
 
Last edited:
Clinton and fossil fuel industry backing her? She claims the Bern is lying?



Then Sanders responds:

"Bernie Sanders sharply criticized Hillary Clinton for taking campaign contributions from energy lobbyists on Sunday -- but he wouldn't back a high-profile surrogate's criticism of Clinton's email controversy.

The Democratic presidential contenders have traded shots in recent days over contributions from those with fossil fuel ties. Sanders said the problem isn't individual contributions from those working for energy companies -- but Clinton and her super PAC taking money from oil and gas lobbyists...:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/03/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-oil-gas-money/index.html
 
Last edited:
Here is what you get when you don't have the corporate media interviewing the Bern:

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top