this shows you... that no one has any idea what the fed is doing.
can you believe the song and dance about the bailouts was for less than a trillion while the fed was creating 16 trillion or so... that we now know about.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/traceyg...outs-under-reported/#2715e4857a0b34efbe7a6877
The Fed's $16 Trillion Bailouts Under-Reported
The media’s inscrutable brush-off of the Government Accounting Office’s recently released audit of the Federal Reserve has raised many questions about the Fed’s goings-on since the financial crisis began in 2008.
The audit of the Fed’s emergency lending programs was scarcely reported by mainstream media – albeit the results are undoubtedly newsworthy. It is the first audit of the Fed in United States history since its beginnings in 1913. The findings verify that over $16 trillion was allocated to corporations and banks internationally, purportedly for “financial assistance” during and after the 2008 fiscal crisis.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) amended the Wall Street Reform law to audit the Fed, pushing the GAO to step in and take a look around. Upon hearing the announcement that the first-ever audit would take place in July, the media was bowled over and nearly every broadcast network and newspaper covered the story. However, the audit’s findings were almost completely overlooked, even with a number as high as $16 trillion staring all of us in the face.
Sanders press release, dated July 21st, stated:
“No agency of the United States government should be allowed to bailout a foreign bank or corporation without the direct approval of Congress and the president.”
The report serves as a clear testimony of the Fed’s emergency action plan to bailout foreign corporations and banks in a time of crisis, but the GAO report does not berate the Fed; rather, it provides a lucid explanation of where the money was allocated and why.
can you believe the song and dance about the bailouts was for less than a trillion while the fed was creating 16 trillion or so... that we now know about.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/traceyg...outs-under-reported/#2715e4857a0b34efbe7a6877
The Fed's $16 Trillion Bailouts Under-Reported
The media’s inscrutable brush-off of the Government Accounting Office’s recently released audit of the Federal Reserve has raised many questions about the Fed’s goings-on since the financial crisis began in 2008.
The audit of the Fed’s emergency lending programs was scarcely reported by mainstream media – albeit the results are undoubtedly newsworthy. It is the first audit of the Fed in United States history since its beginnings in 1913. The findings verify that over $16 trillion was allocated to corporations and banks internationally, purportedly for “financial assistance” during and after the 2008 fiscal crisis.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) amended the Wall Street Reform law to audit the Fed, pushing the GAO to step in and take a look around. Upon hearing the announcement that the first-ever audit would take place in July, the media was bowled over and nearly every broadcast network and newspaper covered the story. However, the audit’s findings were almost completely overlooked, even with a number as high as $16 trillion staring all of us in the face.
Sanders press release, dated July 21st, stated:
“No agency of the United States government should be allowed to bailout a foreign bank or corporation without the direct approval of Congress and the president.”
The report serves as a clear testimony of the Fed’s emergency action plan to bailout foreign corporations and banks in a time of crisis, but the GAO report does not berate the Fed; rather, it provides a lucid explanation of where the money was allocated and why.
It cost a lot of money to be constantly bombing and killing people all around the world. And with mil spec toilet seats being as high as they are, I suppose much of the deficits and therefore the inflation you see is explained. What do you think? You wouldn't want the U.S. to be weak would you? The Republican candidates are falling all over themselves to see who can claim to be the biggest military spender, and thank goodness. Otherwise think what could happen if we only spent three times per capita what other nations do on their military. I shudder to think! It cost ~6 million to kill each person in Iraq. Good deal I say! Otherwise we could have ended up wasting that money on something communist like early childhood education. Or worse yet, grade schools, for god sake! And besides what would all those people do for a living if they weren't making missiles? You wouldn't want them to have to teach grade school, would you?