The Bern Identity
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
This is just terrible 
Emails Renew Questions About Clinton Foundation and State Dept. Overlap
WASHINGTON — A new batch of State Department emails released Tuesday showed the close and sometimes overlapping interests between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.
The documents raised new questions about whether the charitable foundation worked to reward its donors with access and influence at the State Department, a charge that Mrs. Clinton has faced in the past and has always denied.
Sign Up For NYT Now's Morning Briefing Newsletter
In one email exchange, for instance, an executive at the Clinton Foundation in 2009 sought to put a billionaire donor in touch with the United States ambassador to Lebanon because of the donor’s interests there.
In another email, the foundation appeared to push aides to Mrs. Clinton to help find a job for a foundation associate. Her aides indicated that the department was working on the request.
Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, which has been shadowed for 17 months by the controversy over the private email server she used exclusively while at the State Department, had no immediate comment on the documents.
The State Department turned the new emails over to a conservative advocacy group, Judicial Watch, as part of a lawsuit that the group brought under the Freedom of Information Act.
The documents included 44 emails that were not among some 55,000 pages of emails that Mrs. Clinton had previously given to the State Department, which she said represented all her “work-related” emails....
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-and-state-dept-overlap/ar-BBvsbs3?li=BBnb7Kz
Emails Renew Questions About Clinton Foundation and State Dept. Overlap
WASHINGTON — A new batch of State Department emails released Tuesday showed the close and sometimes overlapping interests between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.
The documents raised new questions about whether the charitable foundation worked to reward its donors with access and influence at the State Department, a charge that Mrs. Clinton has faced in the past and has always denied.
Sign Up For NYT Now's Morning Briefing Newsletter
In one email exchange, for instance, an executive at the Clinton Foundation in 2009 sought to put a billionaire donor in touch with the United States ambassador to Lebanon because of the donor’s interests there.
In another email, the foundation appeared to push aides to Mrs. Clinton to help find a job for a foundation associate. Her aides indicated that the department was working on the request.
Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, which has been shadowed for 17 months by the controversy over the private email server she used exclusively while at the State Department, had no immediate comment on the documents.
The State Department turned the new emails over to a conservative advocacy group, Judicial Watch, as part of a lawsuit that the group brought under the Freedom of Information Act.
The documents included 44 emails that were not among some 55,000 pages of emails that Mrs. Clinton had previously given to the State Department, which she said represented all her “work-related” emails....
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-and-state-dept-overlap/ar-BBvsbs3?li=BBnb7Kz
^ And yet the Bern and the entire DNC strongly endorse her. What did it take for Bernie to sellout? Hell, what has it taken for every left leaning person to sell out? 50 years ago these people, in many cases these very same people were protesting the criminally corrupt government. Fast forward and every fucking one of them is either in the government willfully participating in a exact same bullshit they supposedly hated, and/or providing cover for the criminals in government doing the same shit they were so opposed to.
To me the issue is Assange thinking he can convince me that Clinton and the democrats, who he admits he has a personal vendetta against, are the only politician and party who engage in these subterfuges, therefore vote Trump. Aint gonna happen. I know damn well the reps do it, too. I see politicking from the level of my front line cube workers right on up to, of course they do it, the executive management team.
Ricter, no one is suggesting to vote for Trump. But Clinton, oh man, ___I___ am regurgitating at the thought of voting for her.
I don't know how EW and the Bern can sleep at night. I think it might have been correct to not endorse her. I say that with great angst and sadness. Cruz is a monster asshole, but at least he stands his ground. Kasich is neither an asshole and he stands his ground. Everyone on the Democratic side has weak knees man. Even the men are acting like bitches on the Democratic side. The DNC is all being run by vindictive women!
Clinton like Trump also has a Jekill and Hyde personality!
Last edited:
I don't think that's what Assange is up to at all. What he is doing is making the point, very adeptly making the point, that the left wing and the right wing are attached to the same body. The entire system is corrupt to the core. Every last one of them. Assange continues to illustrate that while Trump may indeed be a disaster in the making, Hillary is no better, and in some cases far worse.
Then the original proposition remains unchanged: the lesser of two evils.
He has publicly stated that he's after Hillary.
Good. She's a sell out, and goes against everything the democratic party is claiming to stand for. She's also a criminal and these e-mails prove that her and Bill can be bought. A former president and Secretary of State bought and paid for. Corruption at the very highest levels of government. How can any person claiming to be concerned about political corruption support her?