Thank you. I appreciate you taking the time to explain. It will be on my to do list to look carefully at what you commented.Buy a deep OTM condor... You'll see how easy it is to improve on what he's holding.
Thank you. I appreciate you taking the time to explain. It will be on my to do list to look carefully at what you commented.Buy a deep OTM condor... You'll see how easy it is to improve on what he's holding.
Here's a simple long condor normed to his max-loss. $28. 8x debit good for $155K terminal PNL on the table.
View attachment 231673
Dest is clueless as to the particulars of my strategy and is not man enough to unblock me so that I can see his comments!Fairly speaking, Dest has a valid point. The structure designed by Sweet Bobby, requires layers on layers of positions, and if dissected properly, it might contain many redundant positions that are pretty much counter balancing each other and not helping the net portfolio profile. 0.10$ slippage on each execution multiplied by average 180 positions in and out every 2 months, and the costs add up pretty fast.
Apparently dorky destriero has blocked me from seeing his posts, but I can see that he posted something on my thread. I'm sure his comment was not kind towards me. Would someone please let him know if he's got something to say, he can say it to my face.
Thanks!
Sweet B
Fairly speaking, Dest has a valid point. The structure designed by Sweet Bobby, requires layers on layers of positions, and if dissected properly, it might contain many redundant positions that are pretty much counter balancing each other and not helping the net portfolio profile. 0.10$ slippage on each execution multiplied by average 180 positions in and out every 2 months, and the costs add up pretty fast.
Fairly speaking, Dest has a valid point. The structure designed by Sweet Bobby, requires layers on layers of positions, and if dissected properly, it might contain many redundant positions that are pretty much counter balancing each other and not helping the net portfolio profile. 0.10$ slippage on each execution multiplied by average 180 positions in and out every 2 months, and the costs add up pretty fast.
I meant it to be more of as a complement, but obviously it didn't come off that way. So I apologize. What I really meant to say is that I would rather be stupid, lucky, and rich....than smart, bitter, and poor anyday. So there's no shame in not knowing the nuances and details of option skew behavior. If you're strategy is making bank while others are losing their shirts, you will always have the last laugh.
Hello Sigma,This post really gets ones pondering.
I wonder often if consuming too much øptionality knowledge could hurt ones abilities to actually trade? A lot of people get caught up in 7th moment distributions but can't mint coinage. Maybe less is more, for some? I guess it all depends. You have desty who can trade very well plus is an encyclopedia for anything øptionality. But then you got the dude across the street selling cash secured puts monthly and banking greenbacks. It all depends.
Hello Sigma,
You've been following my strategy for some time. How many times have the options ”gurus” predepicted the demise of Sweet Bobby? Yet, Sweet Bobby continues to bank the bucks! They lack the guts to trade like I do. I set my risks and go on about life. You know how this story ends.
SB