Quote from marketsurfer:
sorry, i did not mean to stir such emotive criticism, but i welcome it!
let's define trend following: isn't the term itself kind of meaningless? if you are making money, obviously you are with the trend, or losing money you are against the trend. THEREFORE, proper entries must be the hidden secret in getting with the trend. everything i have seen in print regarding trend following states buying higher highs and selling lower lows is how a trend follower enters the market. then, based on example, they HOLD and HOPE the trend they were trying to enter continues or resumes after a nice fat drawdown.
therefore, any directional fund that makes money is a trend following fund by default.
in addition, it seems that trend traders are spread across many markets, and the goal is to make the trends they catch bigger than the ones they miss--hence large sums of capital and even more risk is required to pull it off......
bring it on, show me the logical flaws.
surfer
ps. happy you came out of hiding!
![]()
ok let's talk about trend following...
I just had to go to today's chart of my (and everyone else's) favorite index at the moment...
you can probably figure out where the entries are (indicator based too gasp!)
oh, and this type of day is the norm not the exception